docs: reorganize project structure and update root README
Project Organization: - Moved configuration files to project-config/ directory - Moved documentation files to documentation/ directory - Moved security reports to security/ directory - Moved backup files to backup-config/ directory - Created PROJECT_ORGANIZATION_SUMMARY.md documenting changes - Updated all script references to new file locations Root README Simplification: - Replaced 715-line detailed README with 95-line structure guide
This commit is contained in:
202
security/SECURITY_VULNERABILITY_REPORT.md
Normal file
202
security/SECURITY_VULNERABILITY_REPORT.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
|
||||
# AITBC Security Vulnerability Report
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Vulnerabilities Found: 365**
|
||||
- Critical: 8
|
||||
- High: 105
|
||||
- Medium: 130
|
||||
- Low: 122
|
||||
|
||||
*Report generated: 2026-04-02*
|
||||
|
||||
## Immediate Critical Issues
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. pip Package Vulnerabilities (2 CVEs)
|
||||
**Packages:** pip 25.1.1
|
||||
- **CVE-2025-8869**: Arbitrary File Overwrite (High)
|
||||
- **CVE-2026-1703**: Path Traversal (High)
|
||||
- **Fix**: Upgrade pip to >=26.0
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Code Security Issues (3 High)
|
||||
**Files:** cli/utils/kyc_aml_providers.py, cli/utils/subprocess.py
|
||||
- **B324**: Weak MD5 hash usage (2 instances)
|
||||
- **B602**: subprocess with shell=True (1 instance)
|
||||
|
||||
## Detailed Findings
|
||||
|
||||
### Dependency Vulnerabilities
|
||||
|
||||
#### Critical/High Priority Dependencies
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Immediate fixes needed
|
||||
pip install --upgrade pip>=26.0
|
||||
|
||||
# Check other high-risk packages
|
||||
safety check --json --output safety-report.json
|
||||
pip-audit --format=json --output=pip-audit-report.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Medium Priority Dependencies
|
||||
- cryptography >=46.0.0 ✅ (Already updated)
|
||||
- requests >=2.32.0 ✅ (Already updated)
|
||||
- httpx >=0.28.0 ✅ (Already updated)
|
||||
|
||||
### Code Security Issues
|
||||
|
||||
#### High Severity
|
||||
1. **MD5 Hash Usage** (cli/utils/kyc_aml_providers.py:127, 187)
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Current (vulnerable)
|
||||
hash_val = int(hashlib.md5(request_id.encode()).hexdigest()[:8], 16)
|
||||
|
||||
# Fix (SHA-256)
|
||||
hash_val = int(hashlib.sha256(request_id.encode()).hexdigest()[:8], 16)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Subprocess Shell Injection** (cli/utils/subprocess.py:12)
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Current (vulnerable)
|
||||
result = subprocess.run(cmd_str, shell=True, check=check, ...)
|
||||
|
||||
# Fix (no shell)
|
||||
result = subprocess.run(cmd, check=check, shell=False, ...)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Medium Severity
|
||||
- Hardcoded credentials in test files
|
||||
- Insecure random number generation
|
||||
- Missing input validation
|
||||
|
||||
#### Low Severity
|
||||
- Use of assert statements (244 instances)
|
||||
- Broad except clauses (38 instances)
|
||||
- Subprocess usage (multiple instances)
|
||||
|
||||
## Remediation Plan
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Critical Fixes (Immediate - <24 hours)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Update pip**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python3 -m pip install --upgrade pip>=26.0
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Fix MD5 Usage**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Replace MD5 with SHA-256 in KYC/AML providers
|
||||
sed -i 's/hashlib.md5/hashlib.sha256/g' cli/utils/kyc_aml_providers.py
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Fix Subprocess Security**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Remove shell=True from subprocess calls
|
||||
# Update cli/utils/subprocess.py
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: High Priority (1-3 days)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Update Dependencies**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Update all packages with known vulnerabilities
|
||||
pip install --upgrade -r requirements.txt
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Security Testing**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Run comprehensive security scans
|
||||
bandit -r cli/ -f json -o bandit-report.json
|
||||
safety check --json --output safety-report.json
|
||||
pip-audit --format=json --output=pip-audit-report.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Medium Priority (1 week)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Code Review & Refactoring**
|
||||
- Remove assert statements from production code
|
||||
- Add proper input validation
|
||||
- Implement secure error handling
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Security Policies**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Create .bandit configuration
|
||||
# Create safety policy file
|
||||
# Set up pre-commit security hooks
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Low Priority (2 weeks)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Documentation & Training**
|
||||
- Security best practices guide
|
||||
- Developer security training
|
||||
- Security testing procedures
|
||||
|
||||
## Automated Security Setup
|
||||
|
||||
### Pre-commit Hooks
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
# .pre-commit-config.yaml
|
||||
repos:
|
||||
- repo: https://github.com/pycqa/bandit
|
||||
rev: 1.7.0
|
||||
hooks:
|
||||
- id: bandit
|
||||
args: ['-r', 'cli/']
|
||||
- repo: https://github.com/pyupio/safety
|
||||
rev: 2.3.0
|
||||
hooks:
|
||||
- id: safety
|
||||
args: ['--json', '--output', 'safety-report.json']
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### CI/CD Security Pipeline
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
# .github/workflows/security.yml
|
||||
name: Security Scan
|
||||
on: [push, pull_request]
|
||||
jobs:
|
||||
security:
|
||||
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
|
||||
steps:
|
||||
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
|
||||
- name: Run Safety
|
||||
run: safety check --json --output safety-report.json
|
||||
- name: Run Bandit
|
||||
run: bandit -r cli/ -f json -o bandit-report.json
|
||||
- name: Run pip-audit
|
||||
run: pip-audit --format=json --output=pip-audit-report.json
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Compliance & Standards
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Standards Met
|
||||
- ✅ CWE-327: Use of Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm
|
||||
- ✅ CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements
|
||||
- ✅ CWE-703: Improper Check or Handling of Exceptional Conditions
|
||||
|
||||
### Ongoing Monitoring
|
||||
- Daily dependency scans
|
||||
- Weekly code security reviews
|
||||
- Monthly penetration testing
|
||||
- Quarterly security assessments
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
### Current Risk Level: **HIGH**
|
||||
- **Critical**: 8 vulnerabilities require immediate attention
|
||||
- **High**: 105 vulnerabilities could lead to system compromise
|
||||
- **Business Impact**: Data breach, system compromise, financial loss
|
||||
|
||||
### Post-Remediation Risk: **LOW**
|
||||
- All critical vulnerabilities addressed
|
||||
- Automated security monitoring in place
|
||||
- Regular security updates scheduled
|
||||
|
||||
## Contact & Support
|
||||
|
||||
**Security Team**: security@aitbc.io
|
||||
**Emergency**: security-emergency@aitbc.io
|
||||
**GitHub**: https://github.com/oib/AITBC/security
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
*This report will be updated as vulnerabilities are addressed and new ones are discovered.*
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user