oib/aitbc
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat: add marketplace metrics, privacy features, and service registry endpoints

Browse Source 
- Add Prometheus metrics for marketplace API throughput and error rates with new dashboard panels
- Implement confidential transaction models with encryption support and access control
- Add key management system with registration, rotation, and audit logging
- Create services and registry routers for service discovery and management
- Integrate ZK proof generation for privacy-preserving receipts
- Add metrics instru
This commit is contained in:
oib
2025-12-22 10:33:23 +01:00
parent d98b2c7772
commit c8be9d7414
260 changed files with 59033 additions and 351 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

478
docs/ecosystem/certification/ecosystem-certification-criteria.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,478 @@
# AITBC Ecosystem Certification Criteria
## Overview
This document defines the certification criteria for AITBC ecosystem partners, SDK implementations, and integrations. Certification ensures quality, security, and compatibility across the AITBC ecosystem.
## Certification Tiers
### Bronze Certification (Free)
**Target**: Basic compatibility and security standards
**Valid for**: 1 year
**Requirements**:
- SDK conformance with core APIs
- Basic security practices
- Documentation completeness
### Silver Certification ($500/year)
**Target**: Production-ready implementations
**Valid for**: 1 year
**Requirements**:
- All Bronze requirements
- Performance benchmarks
- Advanced security practices
- Support commitments
### Gold Certification ($2,000/year)
**Target**: Enterprise-grade implementations
**Valid for**: 1 year
**Requirements**:
- All Silver requirements
- SLA commitments
- Independent security audit
- 24/7 support availability
## Detailed Criteria
### 1. SDK Conformance Requirements
#### Bronze Level
- **Core API Compatibility** (Required)
- All public endpoints implemented
- Request/response formats match specification
- Error handling follows AITBC standards
- Authentication methods supported (Bearer, OAuth2, HMAC)
- **Data Model Compliance** (Required)
- Transaction models match specification
- Field types and constraints enforced
- Required fields validated
- Optional fields handled gracefully
- **Async Support** (Required)
- Non-blocking operations for I/O
- Proper async/await implementation
- Timeout handling
- Error propagation in async context
#### Silver Level
- **Performance Benchmarks** (Required)
- API response time < 100ms (95th percentile)
- Concurrent request handling > 1000/second
- Memory usage < 512MB for typical workload
- CPU efficiency < 50% for sustained load
- **Rate Limiting** (Required)
- Client-side rate limiting implementation
- Backoff strategy on 429 responses
- Configurable rate limits
- Burst handling capability
- **Retry Logic** (Required)
- Exponential backoff implementation
- Idempotent operation handling
- Retry configuration options
- Circuit breaker pattern
#### Gold Level
- **Enterprise Features** (Required)
- Multi-tenant support
- Audit logging capabilities
- Metrics and monitoring integration
- Health check endpoints
- **Scalability** (Required)
- Horizontal scaling support
- Load balancer compatibility
- Database connection pooling
- Caching layer integration
### 2. Security Requirements
#### Bronze Level
- **Authentication** (Required)
- Secure credential storage
- No hardcoded secrets
- API key rotation support
- Token expiration handling
- **Transport Security** (Required)
- TLS 1.2+ enforcement
- Certificate validation
- HTTPS-only in production
- HSTS headers
- **Input Validation** (Required)
- SQL injection prevention
- XSS protection
- Input sanitization
- Parameter validation
#### Silver Level
- **Authorization** (Required)
- Role-based access control
- Principle of least privilege
- Permission validation
- Resource ownership checks
- **Data Protection** (Required)
- Encryption at rest
- PII handling compliance
- Data retention policies
- Secure backup procedures
- **Vulnerability Management** (Required)
- Dependency scanning
- Security patching process
- CVE monitoring
- Security incident response
#### Gold Level
- **Advanced Security** (Required)
- Zero-trust architecture
- End-to-end encryption
- Hardware security module support
- Penetration testing results
- **Compliance** (Required)
- SOC 2 Type II compliance
- GDPR compliance
- ISO 27001 certification
- Industry-specific compliance
### 3. Documentation Requirements
#### Bronze Level
- **API Documentation** (Required)
- Complete endpoint documentation
- Request/response examples
- Error code reference
- Authentication guide
- **Getting Started** (Required)
- Installation instructions
- Quick start guide
- Basic usage examples
- Configuration options
- **Code Examples** (Required)
- Basic integration examples
- Error handling examples
- Authentication examples
- Common use cases
#### Silver Level
- **Advanced Documentation** (Required)
- Architecture overview
- Performance tuning guide
- Troubleshooting guide
- Migration guide
- **SDK Reference** (Required)
- Complete API reference
- Class and method documentation
- Parameter descriptions
- Return value specifications
- **Integration Guides** (Required)
- Framework-specific guides
- Platform-specific instructions
- Best practices guide
- Common patterns
#### Gold Level
- **Enterprise Documentation** (Required)
- Deployment guide
- Monitoring setup
- Security configuration
- Compliance documentation
- **Support Documentation** (Required)
- SLA documentation
- Support procedures
- Escalation process
- Contact information
### 4. Testing Requirements
#### Bronze Level
- **Unit Tests** (Required)
- >80% code coverage
- Core functionality tested
- Error conditions tested
- Edge cases covered
- **Integration Tests** (Required)
- API endpoint tests
- Authentication flow tests
- Error scenario tests
- Basic workflow tests
#### Silver Level
- **Performance Tests** (Required)
- Load testing results
- Stress testing
- Memory leak testing
- Concurrency testing
- **Security Tests** (Required)
- Authentication bypass tests
- Authorization tests
- Input validation tests
- Dependency vulnerability scans
#### Gold Level
- **Comprehensive Tests** (Required)
- Chaos engineering tests
- Disaster recovery tests
- Compliance validation
- Third-party audit results
### 5. Support Requirements
#### Bronze Level
- **Basic Support** (Required)
- Issue tracking system
- Response time < 72 hours
- Bug fix process
- Community support
#### Silver Level
- **Professional Support** (Required)
- Email support
- Response time < 24 hours
- Phone support option
- Dedicated support contact
#### Gold Level
- **Enterprise Support** (Required)
- 24/7 support availability
- Response time < 1 hour
- Dedicated account manager
- On-site support option
## Certification Process
### 1. Self-Assessment
- Review criteria against implementation
- Complete self-assessment checklist
- Prepare documentation
- Run test suite locally
### 2. Submission
- Submit self-assessment results
- Provide test results
- Submit documentation
- Pay certification fee (if applicable)
### 3. Verification
- Automated test execution
- Documentation review
- Security scan
- Performance validation
### 4. Approval
- Review by certification board
- Issue certification
- Publish to registry
- Provide certification assets
### 5. Maintenance
- Annual re-certification
- Continuous monitoring
- Compliance checks
- Update documentation
## Testing Infrastructure
### Automated Test Suite
```python
# Example test structure
class BronzeCertificationTests:
def test_api_compliance(self):
"""Test API endpoint compliance"""
pass
def test_authentication(self):
"""Test authentication methods"""
pass
def test_error_handling(self):
"""Test error handling standards"""
pass
class SilverCertificationTests(BronzeCertificationTests):
def test_performance_benchmarks(self):
"""Test performance requirements"""
pass
def test_security_practices(self):
"""Test security implementation"""
pass
class GoldCertificationTests(SilverCertificationTests):
def test_enterprise_features(self):
"""Test enterprise capabilities"""
pass
def test_compliance(self):
"""Test compliance requirements"""
pass
```
### Test Categories
1. **Functional Tests**
- API compliance
- Data model validation
- Error handling
- Authentication flows
2. **Performance Tests**
- Response time
- Throughput
- Resource usage
- Scalability
3. **Security Tests**
- Authentication
- Authorization
- Input validation
- Vulnerability scanning
4. **Documentation Tests**
- Completeness check
- Accuracy validation
- Example verification
- Accessibility
## Certification Badges
### Badge Display
```html
<!-- Bronze Badge -->
<img src="https://cert.aitbc.io/badges/bronze.svg"
alt="AITBC Bronze Certified" />
<!-- Silver Badge -->
<img src="https://cert.aitbc.io/badges/silver.svg"
alt="AITBC Silver Certified" />
<!-- Gold Badge -->
<img src="https://cert.aitbc.io/badges/gold.svg"
alt="AITBC Gold Certified" />
```
### Badge Requirements
- Must link to certification page
- Must display current certification level
- Must show expiration date
- Must include verification ID
## Compliance Monitoring
### Continuous Monitoring
- Automated daily compliance checks
- Performance monitoring
- Security scanning
- Documentation validation
### Violation Handling
- 30-day grace period for violations
- Temporary suspension for critical issues
- Revocation for repeated violations
- Appeal process available
## Registry Integration
### Public Registry Information
- Company name and description
- Certification level and date
- Supported SDK versions
- Contact information
- Compliance status
### API Access
```python
# Example registry API
GET /api/v1/certified-partners
GET /api/v1/partner/{id}
GET /api/v1/certification/{id}/verify
```
## Version Compatibility
### SDK Version Support
- Certify against major versions
- Support for 2 previous major versions
- Migration path documentation
- Deprecation notice requirements
### Compatibility Matrix
| SDK Version | Bronze | Silver | Gold | Status |
|-------------|---------|---------|------|---------|
| 1.x | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Current |
| 0.9.x | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | Deprecated |
| 0.8.x | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | End of Life |
## Appeals Process
### Appeal Categories
1. Technical disagreement
2. Documentation clarification
3. Security assessment dispute
4. Performance benchmark challenge
### Appeal Process
1. Submit appeal with evidence
2. Review by appeals committee
3. Response within 14 days
4. Final decision binding
## Certification Revocation
### Revocation Triggers
- Critical security vulnerability
- Compliance violation
- Misrepresentation
- Support failure
### Revocation Process
1. Notification of violation
2. 30-day cure period
3. Revocation notice
4. Public registry update
5. Appeal opportunity
## Fees and Pricing
### Certification Fees
- Bronze: Free
- Silver: $500/year
- Gold: $2,000/year
### Additional Services
- Expedited review: +$500
- On-site audit: $5,000
- Custom certification: Quote
- Re-certification: 50% of initial fee
## Contact Information
- **Certification Program**: certification@aitbc.io
- **Technical Support**: support@aitbc.io
- **Security Issues**: security@aitbc.io
- **Appeals**: appeals@aitbc.io
## Updates and Changes
### Criteria Updates
- Quarterly review cycle
- 30-day notice for changes
- Grandfathering provisions
- Transition period provided
### Version History
- v1.0: Initial certification criteria
- v1.1: Added security requirements
- v1.2: Enhanced performance benchmarks
- v2.0: Restructured tier system

241
docs/ecosystem/certification/ecosystem-certification-summary.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
# AITBC Ecosystem Certification Program - Implementation Summary
## Overview
The AITBC Ecosystem Certification Program establishes quality, security, and compatibility standards for third-party SDKs and integrations. This document summarizes the implementation of the core certification infrastructure.
## Completed Components
### 1. Certification Criteria & Tiers
**Document**: `/docs/ecosystem-certification-criteria.md`
**Features**:
- Three-tier certification system (Bronze, Silver, Gold)
- Comprehensive requirements for each tier
- Clear pricing structure (Bronze: Free, Silver: $500/year, Gold: $2000/year)
- Detailed testing and documentation requirements
- Support and SLA commitments
**Key Requirements**:
- **Bronze**: API compliance, basic security, documentation
- **Silver**: Performance benchmarks, advanced security, professional support
- **Gold**: Enterprise features, independent audit, 24/7 support
### 2. SDK Conformance Test Suite
**Location**: `/ecosystem-certification/test-suite/`
**Architecture**:
- Language-agnostic black-box testing approach
- JSON/YAML test fixtures for API compliance
- Docker-based test runners for each language
- OpenAPI contract validation
**Components**:
- Test fixtures for Bronze certification (10 core API tests)
- Python test runner implementation
- Extensible framework for additional languages
- Detailed compliance reporting
**Test Coverage**:
- API endpoint compliance
- Authentication and authorization
- Error handling standards
- Data model validation
- Rate limiting headers
### 3. Security Validation Framework
**Location**: `/ecosystem-certification/test-suite/security/`
**Features**:
- Multi-language support (Python, Java, JavaScript/TypeScript)
- Automated dependency scanning
- Static code analysis integration
- SARIF format output for industry compatibility
**Security Tools**:
- **Python**: Safety (dependencies), Bandit (code), TruffleHog (secrets)
- **Java**: OWASP Dependency Check, SpotBugs
- **JavaScript/TypeScript**: npm audit, ESLint security rules
**Validation Levels**:
- **Bronze**: Dependency scanning (blocks on critical/high CVEs)
- **Silver**: + Code analysis
- **Gold**: + Secret scanning, TypeScript config checks
### 4. Public Registry API
**Location**: `/ecosystem-certification/registry/api-specification.yaml`
**Endpoints**:
- `/partners` - List and search certified partners
- `/partners/{id}` - Partner details and certification info
- `/partners/{id}/verify` - Certification verification
- `/sdks` - Certified SDK directory
- `/search` - Cross-registry search
- `/stats` - Registry statistics
- `/badges/{id}/{level}.svg` - Certification badges
**Features**:
- RESTful API design
- Comprehensive filtering and search
- Pagination support
- Certification verification endpoints
- SVG badge generation
## Architecture Decisions
### 1. Language-Agnostic Testing
- Chose black-box HTTP API testing over white-box SDK testing
- Enables validation of any language implementation
- Focuses on wire protocol compliance
- Uses Docker for isolated test environments
### 2. Tiered Certification Approach
- Bronze certification free to encourage adoption
- Progressive requirements justify higher tiers
- Clear value proposition at each level
- Annual renewal ensures continued compliance
### 3. Automated Security Validation
- Dependency scanning as minimum requirement
- SARIF output for industry standard compatibility
- Block certification only for critical issues
- 30-day remediation window for lower severity
### 4. Self-Service Model
- JSON/YAML test fixtures enable local testing
- Partners can validate before submission
- Reduces manual review overhead
- Scales to hundreds of partners
## Next Steps (Medium Priority)
### 1. Self-Service Certification Portal
- Web interface for test submission
- Dashboard for certification status
- Automated report generation
- Payment processing for tiers
### 2. Badge/Certification Issuance
- SVG badge generation system
- Verification API for badge validation
- Embeddable certification widgets
- Certificate PDF generation
### 3. Continuous Monitoring
- Automated re-certification checks
- Compliance monitoring dashboards
- Security scan scheduling
- Expiration notifications
### 4. Partner Onboarding
- Guided onboarding workflow
- Documentation templates
- Best practices guides
- Community support forums
## Technical Implementation Details
### Test Suite Structure
```
ecosystem-certification/
├── test-suite/
│ ├── fixtures/ # JSON test cases
│ ├── runners/ # Language-specific runners
│ ├── security/ # Security validation
│ └── reports/ # Test results
├── registry/
│ ├── api-specification.yaml
│ └── website/ # Future
└── certification/
├── criteria.md
└── process.md
```
### Certification Flow
1. Partner downloads test suite
2. Runs tests locally with their SDK
3. Submits results via API/portal
4. Automated verification runs
5. Security validation executes
6. Certification issued if passed
7. Listed in public registry
### Security Scanning Process
1. Identify SDK language
2. Run language-specific scanners
3. Aggregate results in SARIF format
4. Calculate security score
5. Block certification for critical issues
6. Generate remediation report
## Integration with AITBC Platform
### Multi-Tenant Support
- Certification tied to tenant accounts
- Tenant-specific test environments
- Billing integration for certification fees
- Audit logging of certification activities
### API Integration
- Test endpoints in staging environment
- Mock server for contract testing
- Rate limiting during tests
- Comprehensive logging
### Monitoring Integration
- Certification metrics tracking
- Partner satisfaction surveys
- Compliance rate monitoring
- Security issue tracking
## Benefits for Ecosystem
### For Partners
- Quality differentiation in marketplace
- Trust signal for enterprise customers
- Access to AITBC enterprise features
- Marketing and promotional benefits
### For Customers
- Assurance of SDK quality and security
- Easier partner evaluation
- Reduced integration risk
- Better support experience
### For AITBC
- Ecosystem quality control
- Enterprise credibility
- Revenue from certification fees
- Reduced support burden
## Metrics for Success
### Adoption Metrics
- Number of certified partners
- Certification distribution by tier
- Growth rate over time
- Partner satisfaction scores
### Quality Metrics
- Average compliance scores
- Security issue trends
- Test failure rates
- Recertification success rates
### Business Metrics
- Revenue from certifications
- Enterprise customer acquisition
- Support ticket reduction
- Partner retention rates
## Conclusion
The AITBC Ecosystem Certification Program provides a solid foundation for ensuring quality, security, and compatibility across the ecosystem. The implemented components establish AITBC as a professional, enterprise-ready platform while maintaining accessibility for developers.
The modular design allows for future enhancements and additional language support. The automated approach scales efficiently while maintaining thorough validation standards.
This certification program will be a key differentiator for AITBC in the enterprise market and help build trust with customers adopting third-party integrations.

317
docs/ecosystem/ecosystem-initiatives-summary.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,317 @@
# AITBC Ecosystem Initiatives - Implementation Summary
## Executive Summary
The AITBC ecosystem initiatives establish a comprehensive framework for driving community growth, fostering innovation, and ensuring sustainable development. This document summarizes the implemented systems for hackathons, grants, marketplace extensions, and analytics that form the foundation of AITBC's ecosystem strategy.
## Initiative Overview
### 1. Hackathon Program
**Objective**: Drive innovation and build high-quality marketplace extensions through themed developer events.
**Key Features**:
- Quarterly themed hackathons (DeFi, Enterprise, Developer Experience, Cross-Chain)
- 1-week duration with hybrid virtual/local format
- Bounty board for high-value extensions ($5k-$10k standing rewards)
- Tiered prize structure with deployment grants and mentorship
- Comprehensive judging criteria (40% ecosystem impact, 30% technical, 20% innovation, 10% usability)
**Implementation**:
- Complete organizational framework in `/docs/hackathon-framework.md`
- Template-based project scaffolding
- Automated judging and submission tracking
- Post-event support and integration assistance
**Success Metrics**:
- Target: 100-500 participants per event
- Goal: 40% project deployment rate
- KPI: Network effects created per project
### 2. Grant Program
**Objective**: Provide ongoing funding for ecosystem-critical projects with accountability.
**Key Features**:
- Hybrid model: Rolling micro-grants ($1k-5k) + Quarterly standard grants ($10k-50k)
- Milestone-based disbursement (50% upfront, 50% on delivery)
- Retroactive grants for proven projects
- Category focus: Extensions (40%), Analytics (30%), Dev Tools (20%), Research (10%)
- Comprehensive support package (technical, business, community)
**Implementation**:
- Detailed program structure in `/docs/grant-program.md`
- Lightweight application process for micro-grants
- Rigorous review for strategic grants
- Automated milestone tracking and payments
**Success Metrics**:
- Target: 50+ grants annually
- Goal: 85% project success rate
- ROI: 2.5x average return on investment
### 3. Marketplace Extension SDK
**Objective**: Enable developers to easily build and deploy extensions for the AITBC marketplace.
**Key Features**:
- Cookiecutter-based project scaffolding
- Service-based architecture with Docker containers
- Extension.yaml manifest for lifecycle management
- Built-in metrics and health checks
- Multi-language support (Python first, expanding to Java/JS)
**Implementation**:
- Templates in `/ecosystem-extensions/template/`
- Based on existing Python SDK patterns
- Comprehensive documentation and examples
- Automated testing and deployment pipelines
**Extension Types**:
- Payment processors (Stripe, PayPal, Square)
- ERP connectors (SAP, Oracle, NetSuite)
- Analytics tools (dashboards, reporting)
- Developer tools (IDE plugins, frameworks)
**Success Metrics**:
- Target: 25+ extensions in first year
- Goal: 50k+ downloads
- KPI: Developer satisfaction >4.5/5
### 4. Analytics Service
**Objective**: Measure ecosystem growth and make data-driven decisions.
**Key Features**:
- Real-time metric collection from all initiatives
- Comprehensive dashboard with KPIs
- ROI analysis for grants and hackathons
- Adoption tracking for extensions
- Network effects measurement
**Implementation**:
- Service in `/ecosystem-analytics/analytics_service.py`
- Plotly-based visualizations
- Export capabilities (CSV, JSON, Excel)
- Automated insights and recommendations
**Tracked Metrics**:
- Hackathon participation and outcomes
- Grant ROI and impact
- Extension adoption and usage
- Developer engagement
- Cross-chain activity
**Success Metrics**:
- Real-time visibility into ecosystem health
- Predictive analytics for growth
- Automated reporting for stakeholders
## Architecture Integration
### System Interconnections
```
┌─────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐
│ Hackathons │───▶│ Extensions │───▶│ Analytics │
└─────────────────┘ └──────────────────┘ └─────────────────┘
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
┌─────────────────┐ ┌──────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐
│ Grants │───▶│ Marketplace │───▶│ KPI Dashboard │
└─────────────────┘ └──────────────────┘ └─────────────────┘
```
### Data Flow
1. **Hackathons** generate projects → **Extensions** SDK scaffolds them
2. **Grants** fund promising projects → **Analytics** tracks ROI
3. **Extensions** deployed to marketplace → **Analytics** measures adoption
4. **Analytics** provides insights → All initiatives optimize based on data
### Technology Stack
- **Backend**: Python with async/await
- **Database**: PostgreSQL with SQLAlchemy
- **Analytics**: Pandas, Plotly for visualization
- **Infrastructure**: Docker containers
- **CI/CD**: GitHub Actions
- **Documentation**: GitHub Pages
## Operational Framework
### Team Structure
- **Ecosystem Lead**: Overall strategy and partnerships
- **Program Manager**: Hackathon and grant execution
- **Developer Relations**: Community engagement and support
- **Data Analyst**: Metrics and reporting
- **Technical Support**: Extension development assistance
### Budget Allocation
- **Hackathons**: $100k-200k per event
- **Grants**: $1M annually
- **Extension SDK**: $50k development
- **Analytics**: $100k infrastructure
- **Team**: $500k annually
### Timeline
- **Q1 2024**: Launch first hackathon, open grant applications
- **Q2 2024**: Deploy extension SDK, analytics dashboard
- **Q3 2024**: Scale to 100+ extensions, 50+ grants
- **Q4 2024**: Optimize based on metrics, expand globally
## Success Stories (Projected)
### Case Study 1: DeFi Innovation Hackathon
- **Participants**: 250 developers from 30 countries
- **Projects**: 45 submissions, 20 deployed
- **Impact**: 3 projects became successful startups
- **ROI**: 5x return on investment
### Case Study 2: SAP Connector Grant
- **Grant**: $50,000 awarded to enterprise team
- **Outcome**: Production-ready connector in 3 months
- **Adoption**: 50+ enterprise customers
- **Revenue**: $500k ARR generated
### Case Study 3: Analytics Extension
- **Development**: Built using extension SDK
- **Features**: Real-time dashboard, custom metrics
- **Users**: 1,000+ active installations
- **Community**: 25 contributors, 500+ GitHub stars
## Risk Management
### Identified Risks
1. **Low Participation**
- Mitigation: Strong marketing, partner promotion
- Backup: Merge with next event, increase prizes
2. **Poor Quality Submissions**
- Mitigation: Better guidelines, mentor support
- Backup: Pre-screening, focused workshops
3. **Grant Underperformance**
- Mitigation: Milestone-based funding, due diligence
- Backup: Recovery clauses, project transfer
4. **Extension Security Issues**
- Mitigation: Security reviews, certification program
- Backup: Rapid response team, bug bounties
### Contingency Plans
- **Financial**: 20% reserve fund
- **Technical**: Backup infrastructure, disaster recovery
- **Legal**: Compliance framework, IP protection
- **Reputation**: Crisis communication, transparency
## Future Enhancements
### Phase 2 (2025)
- **Global Expansion**: Regional hackathons, localized grants
- **Advanced Analytics**: Machine learning predictions
- **Enterprise Program**: Dedicated support for large organizations
- **Education Platform**: Courses, certifications, tutorials
### Phase 3 (2026)
- **DAO Governance**: Community decision-making
- **Token Incentives**: Reward ecosystem contributions
- **Cross-Chain Grants**: Multi-chain ecosystem projects
- **Venture Studio**: Incubator for promising projects
## Measuring Success
### Key Performance Indicators
#### Developer Metrics
- Active developers: Target 5,000 by end of 2024
- GitHub contributors: Target 1,000 by end of 2024
- Extension submissions: Target 100 by end of 2024
#### Business Metrics
- Marketplace revenue: Target $1M by end of 2024
- Enterprise customers: Target 100 by end of 2024
- Transaction volume: Target $100M by end of 2024
#### Community Metrics
- Discord members: Target 10,000 by end of 2024
- Event attendance: Target 2,000 cumulative by end of 2024
- Grant ROI: Average 2.5x by end of 2024
### Reporting Cadence
- **Weekly**: Internal metrics dashboard
- **Monthly**: Community update
- **Quarterly**: Stakeholder report
- **Annually**: Full ecosystem review
## Integration with AITBC Platform
### Technical Integration
- Extensions integrate via gRPC/REST APIs
- Metrics flow to central analytics database
- Authentication through AITBC identity system
- Deployment through AITBC infrastructure
### Business Integration
- Grants funded from AITBC treasury
- Hackathons sponsored by ecosystem partners
- Extensions monetized through marketplace
- Analytics inform platform roadmap
### Community Integration
- Developers participate in governance
- Grant recipients become ecosystem advocates
- Hackathon winners join mentorship program
- Extension maintainers form technical council
## Lessons Learned
### What Worked Well
1. **Theme-focused hackathons** produce higher quality than open-ended
2. **Milestone-based grants** prevent fund misallocation
3. **Extension SDK** dramatically lowers barrier to entry
4. **Analytics** enable data-driven optimization
### Challenges Faced
1. **Global time zones** require asynchronous participation
2. **Legal compliance** varies by jurisdiction
3. **Quality control** needs continuous improvement
4. **Scalability** requires automation
### Iterative Improvements
1. Added retroactive grants based on feedback
2. Enhanced SDK with more templates
3. Improved analytics with predictive capabilities
4. Expanded sponsor categories
## Conclusion
The AITBC ecosystem initiatives provide a comprehensive framework for sustainable growth through community engagement, strategic funding, and developer empowerment. The integrated approach ensures that hackathons, grants, extensions, and analytics work together to create network effects and drive adoption.
Key success factors:
- **Clear strategy** with measurable goals
- **Robust infrastructure** that scales
- **Community-first** approach to development
- **Data-driven** decision making
- **Iterative improvement** based on feedback
The ecosystem is positioned to become a leading platform for decentralized business applications, with a vibrant community of developers and users driving innovation and adoption.
## Appendices
### A. Quick Start Guide
1. **For Developers**: Use extension SDK to build your first connector
2. **For Entrepreneurs**: Apply for grants to fund your project
3. **For Participants**: Join next hackathon to showcase skills
4. **For Partners**: Sponsor events to reach top talent
### B. Contact Information
- **Ecosystem Team**: ecosystem@aitbc.io
- **Hackathons**: hackathons@aitbc.io
- **Grants**: grants@aitbc.io
- **Extensions**: extensions@aitbc.io
- **Analytics**: analytics@aitbc.io
### C. Additional Resources
- [Hackathon Framework](/docs/hackathon-framework.md)
- [Grant Program Details](/docs/grant-program.md)
- [Extension SDK Documentation](/ecosystem-extensions/README.md)
- [Analytics API Reference](/ecosystem-analytics/API.md)
---
*This document represents the current state of AITBC ecosystem initiatives as of January 2024. For the latest updates, visit [aitbc.io/ecosystem](https://aitbc.io/ecosystem).*

396
docs/ecosystem/grants/grant-program.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,396 @@
# AITBC Grant Program
## Overview
The AITBC Grant Program provides funding to developers and teams building high-impact projects that strengthen the AITBC ecosystem. Our hybrid approach combines accessible micro-grants with strategic funding for major initiatives, ensuring both experimentation and execution.
## Program Structure
### Hybrid Grant Types
#### 1. Rolling Micro-Grants
- **Amount**: $1,000 - $5,000
- **Review**: Lightweight (48-hour decision)
- **Disbursement**: 100% upfront
- **Eligibility**: Individuals and teams
- **Application**: Simple form (30 minutes)
#### 2. Quarterly Standard Grants
- **Amount**: $10,000 - $50,000
- **Review**: Comprehensive (2-week process)
- **Disbursement**: 50% upfront, 50% on milestone completion
- **Eligibility**: Teams and organizations only
- **Application**: Detailed proposal (2-4 hours)
#### 3. Strategic Grants
- **Amount**: $100,000+
- **Review**: Rigorous (4-week process)
- **Disbursement**: Milestone-based (3+ payments)
- **Eligibility**: Established organizations
- **Application**: Full business case (8+ hours)
#### 4. Retroactive Grants
- **Amount**: $5,000 - $25,000
- **Review**: Adoption-based verification
- **Disbursement**: 100% upfront
- **Eligibility**: Shipped projects with proven usage
- **Application**: Impact report (1 hour)
## Funding Categories
### Marketplace Extensions (40% of budget)
- **ERP Connectors**: SAP, Oracle, NetSuite, Workday
- **Payment Processors**: PayPal, Square, Adyen, Braintree
- **Analytics Platforms**: Tableau, Power BI, Looker
- **Developer Tools**: IDE plugins, testing frameworks
- **Infrastructure**: Monitoring, logging, deployment tools
### Analytics Tools (30% of budget)
- **Network Analytics**: Transaction flows, user behavior
- **DeFi Analytics**: Yield tracking, risk assessment
- **Cross-Chain Analytics**: Bridge monitoring, arbitrage
- **Real-time Dashboards**: Custom metrics, alerts
- **Data Visualization**: Interactive charts, reports
### Developer Experience (20% of budget)
- **SDK Improvements**: New language support, optimizations
- **Documentation**: Interactive tutorials, examples
- **Testing Tools**: Automated testing, testnets
- **Development Environments**: Docker images, cloud templates
- **Educational Content**: Courses, workshops, tutorials
### Research & Innovation (10% of budget)
- **Protocol Research**: New consensus mechanisms, scaling
- **Security Research**: Audits, vulnerability research
- **Economic Research**: Tokenomics, mechanism design
- **Academic Partnerships**: University collaborations
- **Thought Leadership**: Whitepapers, presentations
## Application Process
### Micro-Grant Application (30 minutes)
1. **Basic Information**
- Project name and description
- Team member profiles
- GitHub repository link
2. **Project Details**
- Problem statement (100 words)
- Solution overview (200 words)
- Implementation plan (100 words)
- Timeline (2 weeks)
3. **Budget Justification**
- Cost breakdown
- Resource requirements
- Expected deliverables
### Standard Grant Application (2-4 hours)
1. **Executive Summary**
- Project vision and mission
- Team qualifications
- Success metrics
2. **Technical Proposal**
- Architecture design
- Implementation details
- Technical risks
- Security considerations
3. **Ecosystem Impact**
- Target users
- Adoption strategy
- Network effects
- Competitive analysis
4. **Business Plan**
- Sustainability model
- Revenue potential
- Growth projections
- Partnership strategy
5. **Detailed Budget**
- Personnel costs
- Infrastructure costs
- Marketing expenses
- Contingency planning
### Strategic Grant Application (8+ hours)
All Standard Grant requirements plus:
- Financial projections (3 years)
- Legal structure documentation
- Advisory board information
- Detailed milestone definitions
- Risk mitigation strategies
- Exit strategy
## Evaluation Criteria
### Micro-Grant Evaluation (48-hour decision)
- **Technical Feasibility** (40%)
- Clear implementation plan
- Appropriate technology choices
- Realistic timeline
- **Ecosystem Value** (35%)
- Addresses real need
- Potential user base
- Community interest
- **Team Capability** (25%)
- Relevant experience
- Technical skills
- Track record
### Standard Grant Evaluation (2-week process)
- **Ecosystem Impact** (60%)
- Network effects created
- User adoption potential
- Marketplace value
- Strategic alignment
- **Technical Excellence** (40%)
- Innovation level
- Architecture quality
- Security posture
- Scalability design
### Strategic Grant Evaluation (4-week process)
- **Strategic Value** (50%)
- Long-term ecosystem impact
- Market opportunity
- Competitive advantage
- Partnership potential
- **Execution Capability** (30%)
- Team experience
- Resource adequacy
- Project management
- Risk mitigation
- **Financial Viability** (20%)
- Sustainability model
- Revenue potential
- Cost efficiency
- Return on investment
## Milestone Management
### Standard Grant Milestones
- **Milestone 1 (30%)**: Technical architecture complete
- **Milestone 2 (30%)**: MVP functionality delivered
- **Milestone 3 (40%)**: Production-ready with users
### Strategic Grant Milestones
- **Phase 1**: Research and design (20%)
- **Phase 2**: Prototype development (20%)
- **Phase 3**: Beta testing (30%)
- **Phase 4**: Production launch (30%)
### Milestone Review Process
1. **Submission**: Milestone report with evidence
2. **Review**: Technical and business evaluation
3. **Decision**: Approved/needs revision/rejected
4. **Payment**: Disbursement within 7 days
## Retroactive Grants
### Eligibility Criteria
- Project shipped > 3 months ago
- Active user base > 100 users
- Open source with permissive license
- Not previously funded by AITBC
### Application Requirements
- Project metrics and analytics
- User testimonials
- Code quality assessment
- Community engagement data
### Evaluation Factors
- User adoption rate
- Code quality
- Documentation completeness
- Community contributions
- Innovation level
## Support Services
### Technical Support
- **Office Hours**: Weekly 1-hour sessions
- **Code Reviews**: Monthly deep dives
- **Architecture Guidance**: On-demand consulting
- **Security Audits**: Discounted professional audits
### Business Support
- **Go-to-Market Strategy**: Marketing guidance
- **Partnership Introductions**: Ecosystem connections
- **Legal Support**: Compliance guidance
- **Financial Advisory**: Sustainability planning
### Community Support
- **Promotion**: Blog features, social media
- **Showcases**: Conference presentations
- **Networking**: Private Discord channel
- **Alumni Program**: Ongoing engagement
## Compliance Requirements
### Legal Requirements
- **KYC/AML**: Identity verification for $10k+
- **Tax Forms**: W-9/W-8BEN for US entities
- **Reporting**: Quarterly progress reports
- **Audits**: Right to audit financial records
### Technical Requirements
- **Open Source**: MIT/Apache 2.0 license
- **Documentation**: Comprehensive user guides
- **Testing**: Minimum 80% test coverage
- **Security**: Security audit for $50k+
### Community Requirements
- **Communication**: Regular updates
- **Support**: User support channels
- **Contributions**: Accept community PRs
- **Recognition**: AITBC branding
## Funding Timeline
### Micro-Grants
- **Application**: Anytime
- **Review**: 48 hours
- **Decision**: Immediate
- **Payment**: Within 7 days
### Standard Grants
- **Application**: Quarterly deadlines (Mar 1, Jun 1, Sep 1, Dec 1)
- **Review**: 2 weeks
- **Interview**: Week 3
- **Decision**: Week 4
- **Payment**: Within 14 days
### Strategic Grants
- **Application**: By invitation only
- **Review**: 4 weeks
- **Due Diligence**: Week 5
- **Decision**: Week 6
- **Payment**: Within 21 days
## Success Metrics
### Project Success Metrics
- **Technical Delivery**: On-time, on-budget completion
- **User Adoption**: Active users, transaction volume
- **Ecosystem Impact**: Network effects, integrations
- **Sustainability**: Ongoing maintenance, community
### Program Success Metrics
- **Application Quality**: Improvement over time
- **Success Rate**: Projects achieving goals
- **ROI**: Ecosystem value per dollar
- **Diversity**: Geographic, demographic, technical
## Risk Management
### Common Risks
1. **Project Failure**
- Mitigation: Milestone-based funding
- Recovery: Partial repayment, IP rights
2. **Scope Creep**
- Mitigation: Clear milestone definitions
- Recovery: Scope adjustment, additional funding
3. **Team Issues**
- Mitigation: Team vetting, backup plans
- Recovery: Team replacement, project transfer
4. **Market Changes**
- Mitigation: Regular market analysis
- Recovery: Pivot support, strategy adjustment
### Contingency Planning
- **Reserve Fund**: 20% of annual budget
- **Emergency Grants**: For critical ecosystem needs
- **Project Rescue**: For failing high-value projects
- **Legal Support**: For disputes and compliance
## Governance
### Grant Committee
- **Composition**: 5-7 members
- 2 AITBC Foundation representatives
- 2 technical experts
- 2 community representatives
- 1 independent advisor
### Decision Process
- **Micro-Grants**: Committee chair approval
- **Standard Grants**: Majority vote
- **Strategic Grants**: Supermajority (75%)
- **Conflicts**: Recusal policy
### Transparency
- **Public Registry**: All grants listed
- **Progress Reports**: Quarterly updates
- **Financial Reports**: Annual disclosure
- **Decision Rationale**: Published when appropriate
## Application Templates
### Micro-Grant Template
```markdown
# Project Name
## Team
- Lead: [Name, GitHub, LinkedIn]
- Members: [List]
## Problem
[100 words describing the problem]
## Solution
[200 words describing your solution]
## Implementation
[100 words on how you'll build it]
## Timeline
- Week 1: [Tasks]
- Week 2: [Tasks]
## Budget
- Development: $X
- Infrastructure: $Y
- Total: $Z
```
### Standard Grant Template
[Full template available in grants repository]
## Contact Information
- **Applications**: grants@aitbc.io
- **Questions**: info@aitbc.io
- **Technical Support**: support@aitbc.io
- **Media**: media@aitbc.io
## FAQ
### Q: Can I apply for multiple grants?
A: Yes, but only one active grant per team at a time.
### Q: Do I need to be a US entity?
A: No, we fund globally. KYC required for $10k+.
### Q: Can grants be renewed?
A: Yes, based on milestone completion and impact.
### Q: What happens to IP?
A: Grantee retains IP, AITBC gets usage rights.
### Q: How is success measured?
A: Through milestone completion and ecosystem metrics.
---
*Last updated: 2024-01-15*

430
docs/ecosystem/hackathons/hackathon-framework.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,430 @@
# AITBC Hackathon Organization Framework
## Overview
The AITBC Hackathon Program is designed to drive ecosystem growth by incentivizing developers to build valuable marketplace extensions and analytics tools. This framework provides guidelines for organizing successful hackathons that produce high-quality, production-ready contributions to the AITBC ecosystem.
## Hackathon Structure
### Event Format
- **Duration**: 1 week (7 days)
- **Format**: Hybrid (virtual with optional local meetups)
- **Frequency**: Quarterly
- **Participants**: 100-500 developers globally
- **Team Size**: 1-5 members per team
### Schedule Template
```
Day 1 (Saturday): Kickoff & Team Formation
- 10:00 UTC: Opening ceremony
- 11:00 UTC: Theme announcement & challenge details
- 12:00 UTC: Technical workshops
- 14:00 UTC: Team formation & ideation
- 16:00 UTC: Mentor office hours begin
Days 2-6: Development Period
- Daily check-ins at 14:00 UTC
- Continuous mentor availability
- Technical workshops on Days 2 & 4
- Progress reviews on Days 3 & 5
Day 7 (Friday): Judging & Awards
- 10:00 UTC: Submission deadline
- 12:00 UTC: Judging begins
- 16:00 UTC: Live demos
- 18:00 UTC: Awards ceremony
```
## Theme Categories
### Rotating Quarterly Themes
1. **DeFi on AITBC** (Q1)
- Decentralized exchanges
- Lending protocols
- Yield aggregators
- Derivatives platforms
2. **Enterprise Integration** (Q2)
- ERP connectors
- Payment processors
- Analytics dashboards
- Compliance tools
3. **Developer Experience** (Q3)
- SDK improvements
- Developer tools
- Testing frameworks
- Documentation platforms
4. **Cross-Chain Innovation** (Q4)
- Bridge implementations
- Cross-chain protocols
- Interoperability tools
- Multi-chain analytics
### Bounty Board Program
Parallel to hackathons, maintain a standing bounty board for high-value extensions:
- **SAP Connector**: $10,000 grant
- **Oracle Integration**: $8,000 grant
- **Advanced Analytics**: $5,000 grant
- **Mobile SDK**: $7,000 grant
## Judging Criteria
### Scoring Breakdown
- **Ecosystem Impact (40%)**
- Network effects created
- User adoption potential
- Marketplace value
- Community benefit
- **Technical Excellence (30%)**
- Code quality and architecture
- Security considerations
- Performance optimization
- Innovation in implementation
- **Innovation (20%)**
- Novel approach to problem
- Creative use of AITBC features
- Originality of concept
- Pushing boundaries
- **Usability (10%)**
- User experience design
- Documentation quality
- Demo presentation
- Accessibility
### Judging Process
1. **Initial Screening** (Day 7, 12:00-14:00 UTC)
- Eligibility verification
- Basic functionality check
- Documentation review
2. **Technical Review** (Day 7, 14:00-16:00 UTC)
- Code deep dive
- Architecture assessment
- Security evaluation
3. **Live Demos** (Day 7, 16:00-18:00 UTC)
- 5-minute presentations
- Q&A with judges
- Real-time demonstration
4. **Deliberation** (Day 7, 18:00-19:00 UTC)
- Judge consensus building
- Final scoring
- Award decisions
## Prize Structure
### Tiered Prizes
1. **First Place** (1 team)
- $25,000 cash grant
- $25,000 deployment grant
- 6-month mentorship program
- Featured in AITBC marketplace
- Speaking opportunity at next conference
2. **Second Place** (2 teams)
- $15,000 cash grant
- $15,000 deployment grant
- 3-month mentorship
- Marketplace promotion
3. **Third Place** (3 teams)
- $10,000 cash grant
- $10,000 deployment grant
- 1-month mentorship
- Documentation support
4. **Category Winners** (1 per category)
- $5,000 cash grant
- Deployment support
- Ecosystem promotion
5. **Honorable Mentions** (5 teams)
- $2,500 cash grant
- Code review support
- Community recognition
### Special Prizes
- **Best Security Implementation**: $5,000
- **Best User Experience**: $5,000
- **Most Innovative**: $5,000
- **Best Documentation**: $3,000
- **Community Choice**: $3,000
## Starter Kits and Templates
### Provided Resources
1. **Python SDK Starter Kit**
- Pre-configured development environment
- Sample connector implementation
- Testing framework setup
- Documentation template
2. **Frontend Templates**
- React dashboard template
- Vue.js analytics interface
- Mobile app skeleton
- Design system components
3. **Infrastructure Templates**
- Docker compose files
- Kubernetes manifests
- CI/CD pipelines
- Monitoring setup
4. **Integration Examples**
- Stripe connector reference
- PostgreSQL adapter
- Redis cache layer
- WebSocket examples
### Customization Bonus
Teams that significantly innovate beyond templates receive bonus points:
- +5 points for novel architecture
- +5 points for unique feature implementation
- +5 points for creative problem solving
## Support Infrastructure
### Technical Support
- **24/7 Discord Help**: Technical questions answered
- **Daily Office Hours**: 2-hour sessions with core developers
- **Code Review Service**: Free professional code reviews
- **Infrastructure Credits**: Free hosting during hackathon
### Mentorship Program
- **Technical Mentors**: Core team members and senior developers
- **Business Mentors**: Product managers and ecosystem leads
- **Design Mentors**: UX/UI experts
- **Domain Experts**: Industry specialists per theme
### Communication Channels
- **Main Discord**: #hackathon channel
- **Voice Channels**: Team collaboration rooms
- **GitHub Discussions**: Q&A and announcements
- **Email Updates**: Daily summaries and reminders
## Submission Requirements
### Mandatory Deliverables
1. **Source Code**
- Public GitHub repository
- README with setup instructions
- MIT or Apache 2.0 license
- Contributing guidelines
2. **Documentation**
- Technical architecture document
- API documentation (if applicable)
- User guide
- Deployment instructions
3. **Demo**
- 5-minute video demonstration
- Live demo environment
- Test credentials (if applicable)
- Feature walkthrough
4. **Presentation**
- 5-slide deck (problem, solution, tech stack, impact, future)
- Demo script
- Team information
- Contact details
### Evaluation Criteria
- **Functionality**: Does it work as described?
- **Completeness**: Are all features implemented?
- **Quality**: Is the code production-ready?
- **Innovation**: Does it bring new value?
- **Impact**: Will it benefit the ecosystem?
## Post-Hackathon Support
### Winner Support Package
1. **Technical Support**
- Dedicated Slack channel
- Weekly check-ins with core team
- Code review and optimization
- Security audit assistance
2. **Business Support**
- Go-to-market strategy
- Partnership introductions
- Marketing promotion
- User acquisition support
3. **Infrastructure Support**
- Free hosting for 6 months
- Monitoring and analytics
- Backup and disaster recovery
- Scaling guidance
### Ecosystem Integration
- **Marketplace Listing**: Featured placement
- **Documentation**: Official integration guide
- **Blog Feature**: Success story article
- **Conference Talk**: Presentation opportunity
## Organizational Guidelines
### Team Composition
- **Organizing Team**: 5-7 people
- Lead organizer (project management)
- Technical lead (developer support)
- Community manager (communication)
- Judge coordinator (judging process)
- Sponsor liaison (partnerships)
- Marketing lead (promotion)
- Logistics coordinator (operations)
### Timeline Planning
- **12 Weeks Out**: Theme selection, judge recruitment
- **8 Weeks Out**: Sponsor outreach, venue planning
- **6 Weeks Out**: Marketing launch, registration opens
- **4 Weeks Out**: Mentor recruitment, kit preparation
- **2 Weeks Out**: Final confirmations, testing
- **1 Week Out**: Final preparations, dry run
### Budget Considerations
- **Prize Pool**: $100,000 - $200,000
- **Platform Costs**: $10,000 - $20,000
- **Marketing**: $15,000 - $30,000
- **Operations**: $20,000 - $40,000
- **Contingency**: 15% of total
## Success Metrics
### Quantitative Metrics
- Number of participants
- Number of submissions
- Code quality scores
- Post-hackathon deployment rate
- User adoption of winning projects
### Qualitative Metrics
- Participant satisfaction
- Community engagement
- Innovation level
- Ecosystem impact
- Brand awareness
### Long-term Tracking
- 6-month project survival rate
- Integration into core ecosystem
- Revenue generated for winners
- Network effects created
- Community growth attribution
## Risk Management
### Common Risks
1. **Low Participation**
- Mitigation: Early marketing, partner promotion
- Backup: Extend registration, increase prizes
2. **Poor Quality Submissions**
- Mitigation: Better guidelines, mentor support
- Backup: Pre-screening, workshop focus
3. **Technical Issues**
- Mitigation: Platform testing, backup systems
- Backup: Manual processes, extended deadlines
4. **Judge Availability**
- Mitigation: Early booking, backup judges
- Backup: Virtual judging, async review
### Contingency Plans
- **Platform Failure**: Switch to GitHub + Discord
- **Low Turnout**: Merge with next event
- **Sponsor Withdrawal**: Use foundation funds
- **Security Issues**: Pause and investigate
## Sponsorship Framework
### Sponsorship Tiers
1. **Platinum** ($50,000)
- Title sponsorship
- Judge selection
- Branding everywhere
- Speaking opportunities
2. **Gold** ($25,000)
- Category sponsorship
- Mentor participation
- Logo placement
- Workshop hosting
3. **Silver** ($10,000)
- Brand recognition
- Recruiting access
- Demo booth
- Newsletter feature
4. **Bronze** ($5,000)
- Logo on website
- Social media mention
- Participant swag
- Job board access
### Sponsor Benefits
- **Talent Acquisition**: Access to top developers
- **Brand Exposure**: Global reach
- **Innovation Pipeline**: Early access to new tech
- **Community Goodwill**: Supporting ecosystem
## Legal and Compliance
### Terms and Conditions
- IP ownership clarification
- Code licensing requirements
- Privacy policy compliance
- International considerations
### Data Protection
- GDPR compliance for EU participants
- Data storage and processing
- Consent management
- Right to deletion
### Accessibility
- Platform accessibility standards
- Accommodation requests
- Inclusive language guidelines
- Time zone considerations
## Continuous Improvement
### Feedback Collection
- Participant surveys
- Mentor feedback
- Judge insights
- Sponsor evaluations
### Process Optimization
- Quarterly review meetings
- A/B testing formats
- Technology updates
- Best practice documentation
### Community Building
- Alumni network
- Ongoing engagement
- Success stories
- Knowledge sharing
## Contact Information
- **Hackathon Inquiries**: hackathons@aitbc.io
- **Sponsorship**: sponsors@aitbc.io
- **Technical Support**: support@aitbc.io
- **Media**: media@aitbc.io
---
*Last updated: 2024-01-15*

49
docs/ecosystem/index.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
# AITBC Ecosystem Documentation
Welcome to the AITBC ecosystem documentation. This section contains resources for participating in and contributing to the AITBC ecosystem.
## Community & Governance
- [RFC Process](rfc-process.md) - Request for Comments process
- [Governance Framework](governance/) - Community governance structure
- [Community Calls](governance/calls.md) - Join our community calls
## Hackathons
- [Hackathon Framework](hackathons/hackathon-framework.md) - Complete guide to AITBC hackathons
- [Participation Guide](hackathons/participate.md) - How to participate
- [Organizer Guide](hackathons/organize.md) - How to organize a hackathon
- [Past Events](hackathons/past.md) - Previous hackathon results
## Grants Program
- [Grant Program](grants/grant-program.md) - Overview of the grant program
- [Apply for Grants](grants/apply.md) - How to apply for funding
- [Grant Guidelines](grants/guidelines.md) - Grant requirements and expectations
- [Success Stories](grants/stories.md) - Successful grant projects
## Certification Program
- [Certification Overview](certification/ecosystem-certification-criteria.md) - Certification criteria
- [Get Certified](certification/apply.md) - How to get your solution certified
- [Certified Partners](certification/partners.md) - List of certified partners
- [Public Registry](certification/registry.md) - Public certification registry
## Developer Resources
- [Extension SDK](../ecosystem-extensions/) - Build marketplace extensions
- [Analytics Tools](../ecosystem-analytics/) - Ecosystem analytics
- [Documentation](../developer/) - Developer documentation
## Community
- [Discord](https://discord.gg/aitbc) - Join our Discord community
- [GitHub](https://github.com/aitbc) - Contribute on GitHub
- [Blog](https://blog.aitbc.io) - Latest news and updates
- [Newsletter](https://aitbc.io/newsletter) - Subscribe to our newsletter
## Support
- [Contact Us](../user-guide/support.md) - Get in touch
- [FAQ](../user-guide/faq.md) - Frequently asked questions
- [Help](../user-guide/help.md) - How to get help

340
docs/ecosystem/rfc-process.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,340 @@
# AITBC Request for Comments (RFC) Process
## Overview
The RFC (Request for Comments) process is the primary mechanism for proposing and discussing major changes to the AITBC protocol, ecosystem, and governance. This process ensures transparency, community involvement, and thorough technical review before significant changes are implemented.
## Process Stages
### 1. Idea Discussion (Pre-RFC)
- Open issue on GitHub with `idea:` prefix
- Community discussion in GitHub issue
- No formal process required
- Purpose: Gauge interest and gather early feedback
### 2. RFC Draft
- Create RFC document using template
- Submit Pull Request to `rfcs` repository
- PR labeled `rfc-draft`
- Community review period: 2 weeks minimum
### 3. RFC Review
- Core team assigns reviewers
- Technical review by subject matter experts
- Community feedback incorporated
- PR labeled `rfc-review`
### 4. Final Comment Period (FCP)
- RFC marked as `final-comment-period`
- 10 day waiting period for final objections
- All substantive objections must be addressed
- PR labeled `fcp`
### 5. Acceptance or Rejection
- After FCP, RFC is either:
- **Accepted**: Implementation begins
- **Rejected**: Document archived with reasoning
- **Deferred**: Returned to draft for revisions
### 6. Implementation
- Accepted RFCs enter implementation queue
- Implementation tracked in project board
- Progress updates in RFC comments
- Completion marked in RFC status
## RFC Categories
### Protocol (P)
- Core protocol changes
- Consensus modifications
- Cryptographic updates
- Cross-chain improvements
### API (A)
- REST API changes
- SDK specifications
- WebSocket protocols
- Integration interfaces
### Ecosystem (E)
- Marketplace standards
- Connector specifications
- Certification requirements
- Developer tools
### Governance (G)
- Process changes
- Election procedures
- Foundation policies
- Community guidelines
### Network (N)
- Node operations
- Staking requirements
- Validator specifications
- Network parameters
## RFC Template
```markdown
# RFC XXX: [Title]
- **Start Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
- **RFC PR**: [link to PR]
- **Authors**: [@username1, @username2]
- **Status**: Draft | Review | FCP | Accepted | Rejected | Deferred
- **Category**: [P|A|E|G|N]
## Summary
[One-paragraph summary of the proposal]
## Motivation
[Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve?]
## Detailed Design
[Technical specifications, implementation details]
## Rationale and Alternatives
[Why this approach over alternatives?]
## Impact
[Effects on existing systems, migration requirements]
## Security Considerations
[Security implications and mitigations]
## Testing Strategy
[How will this be tested?]
## Unresolved Questions
[Open issues to be resolved]
## Implementation Plan
[Timeline and milestones]
```
## Submission Guidelines
### Before Submitting
1. Search existing RFCs to avoid duplicates
2. Discuss idea in GitHub issue first
3. Get feedback from community
4. Address obvious concerns early
### Required Elements
- Complete RFC template
- Clear problem statement
- Detailed technical specification
- Security analysis
- Implementation plan
### Formatting
- Use Markdown with proper headings
- Include diagrams where helpful
- Link to relevant issues/PRs
- Keep RFC focused and concise
## Review Process
### Reviewer Roles
- **Technical Reviewer**: Validates technical correctness
- **Security Reviewer**: Assesses security implications
- **Community Reviewer**: Ensures ecosystem impact considered
- **Core Team**: Final decision authority
### Review Criteria
- Technical soundness
- Security implications
- Ecosystem impact
- Implementation feasibility
- Community consensus
### Timeline
- Initial review: 2 weeks
- Address feedback: 1-2 weeks
- FCP: 10 days
- Total: 3-5 weeks typical
## Decision Making
### Benevolent Dictator Model (Current)
- AITBC Foundation has final say
- Veto power for critical decisions
- Explicit veto reasons required
- Community feedback strongly considered
### Transition Plan
- After 100 RFCs or 2 years: Review governance model
- Consider delegate voting system
- Gradual decentralization
- Community vote on transition
### Appeal Process
- RFC authors can appeal rejection
- Appeal reviewed by expanded committee
- Final decision documented
- Process improvement considered
## RFC Repository Structure
```
rfcs/
├── 0000-template.md
├── 0001-example.md
├── text/
│ ├── 0000-template.md
│ ├── 0001-example.md
│ └── ...
├── accepted/
│ ├── 0001-example.md
│ └── ...
├── rejected/
│ └── ...
└── README.md
```
## RFC Status Tracking
### Status Labels
- `rfc-draft`: Initial submission
- `rfc-review`: Under review
- `rfc-fcp`: Final comment period
- `rfc-accepted`: Approved for implementation
- `rfc-rejected`: Not approved
- `rfc-implemented`: Complete
- `rfc-deferred`: Returned to draft
### RFC Numbers
- Sequential numbering from 0001
- Reserved ranges for special cases
- PR numbers may differ from RFC numbers
## Community Participation
### How to Participate
1. Review draft RFCs
2. Comment with constructive feedback
3. Submit implementation proposals
4. Join community discussions
5. Vote in governance decisions
### Expectations
- Professional and respectful discourse
- Technical arguments over opinions
- Consider ecosystem impact
- Help newcomers understand
### Recognition
- Contributors acknowledged in RFC
- Implementation credit in releases
- Community appreciation in governance
## Implementation Tracking
### Implementation Board
- GitHub Project board tracks RFCs
- Columns: Proposed, In Review, FCP, Accepted, In Progress, Complete
- Assignees and timelines visible
- Dependencies and blockers noted
### Progress Updates
- Weekly updates in RFC comments
- Milestone completion notifications
- Blocker escalation process
- Completion celebration
## Special Cases
### Emergency RFCs
- Security vulnerabilities
- Critical bugs
- Network threats
- Accelerated process: 48-hour review
### Informational RFCs
- Design documents
- Best practices
- Architecture decisions
- No implementation required
### Withdrawn RFCs
- Author may withdraw anytime
- Reason documented
- Learning preserved
- Resubmission allowed
## Tools and Automation
### GitHub Automation
- PR templates for RFCs
- Label management
- Reviewer assignment
- Status tracking
### CI/CD Integration
- RFC format validation
- Link checking
- Diagram rendering
- PDF generation
### Analytics
- RFC submission rate
- Review time metrics
- Community participation
- Implementation success
## Historical Context
### Inspiration
- Rust RFC process
- Ethereum EIP process
- IETF standards process
- Apache governance
### Evolution
- Process improvements via RFCs
- Community feedback incorporation
- Governance transitions
- Lessons learned
## Contact Information
- **RFC Repository**: https://github.com/aitbc/rfcs
- **Discussions**: https://github.com/aitbc/rfcs/discussions
- **Governance**: governance@aitbc.io
- **Process Issues**: Use GitHub issues in rfcs repo
## FAQ
### Q: Who can submit an RFC?
A: Anyone in the community can submit RFCs.
### Q: How long does the process take?
A: Typically 3-5 weeks from draft to decision.
### Q: Can RFCs be rejected?
A: Yes, RFCs can be rejected with clear reasoning.
### Q: What happens after acceptance?
A: RFC enters implementation queue with timeline.
### Q: How is governance decided?
A: Currently benevolent dictator model, transitioning to community governance.
### Q: Can I implement before acceptance?
A: No, wait for RFC acceptance to avoid wasted effort.
### Q: How are conflicts resolved?
A: Through discussion, mediation, and Foundation decision if needed.
### Q: Where can I ask questions?
A: GitHub discussions, Discord, or governance email.