feat: add marketplace metrics, privacy features, and service registry endpoints
- Add Prometheus metrics for marketplace API throughput and error rates with new dashboard panels - Implement confidential transaction models with encryption support and access control - Add key management system with registration, rotation, and audit logging - Create services and registry routers for service discovery and management - Integrate ZK proof generation for privacy-preserving receipts - Add metrics instru
This commit is contained in:
oib
367
research/consortium/framework.md
Normal file
367
research/consortium/framework.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,367 @@
|
||||
# AITBC Research Consortium Framework
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
The AITBC Research Consortium is a collaborative initiative to advance blockchain technology research, focusing on next-generation consensus mechanisms, scalability solutions, and decentralized marketplace innovations. This document outlines the consortium's structure, governance, research areas, and operational framework.
|
||||
|
||||
## Mission Statement
|
||||
|
||||
To accelerate innovation in blockchain technology through collaborative research, establishing AITBC as a leader in next-generation consensus mechanisms and decentralized infrastructure.
|
||||
|
||||
## Consortium Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### Governance Model
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Steering Committee │
|
||||
│ (5 Industry + 5 Academic + 5 AITBC) │
|
||||
└─────────────────┬───────────────────┘
|
||||
│
|
||||
┌─────────────┴─────────────┐
|
||||
│ Executive Director │
|
||||
└─────────────┬─────────────┘
|
||||
│
|
||||
┌─────────────┴─────────────┐
|
||||
│ Research Council │
|
||||
│ (Technical Working Groups) │
|
||||
└─────────────┬─────────────┘
|
||||
│
|
||||
┌─────────────┴─────────────┐
|
||||
│ Research Working Groups │
|
||||
│ (Consensus, Scaling, etc.) │
|
||||
└─────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Membership Tiers
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1. Founding Members
|
||||
- **Commitment**: 3-year minimum, $500K annual contribution
|
||||
- **Benefits**:
|
||||
- Seat on Steering Committee
|
||||
- First access to research outcomes
|
||||
- Co-authorship on whitepapers
|
||||
- Priority implementation rights
|
||||
- **Current Members**: AITBC Foundation, 5 industry partners, 5 academic institutions
|
||||
|
||||
#### 2. Research Partners
|
||||
- **Commitment**: 2-year minimum, $100K annual contribution
|
||||
- **Benefits**:
|
||||
- Participation in Working Groups
|
||||
- Access to research papers
|
||||
- Implementation licenses
|
||||
- Consortium events attendance
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3. Associate Members
|
||||
- **Commitment**: 1-year minimum, $25K annual contribution
|
||||
- **Benefits**:
|
||||
- Observer status in meetings
|
||||
- Access to published research
|
||||
- Event participation
|
||||
- Newsletter and updates
|
||||
|
||||
## Research Areas
|
||||
|
||||
### Primary Research Tracks
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1. Next-Generation Consensus Mechanisms
|
||||
**Objective**: Develop hybrid PoA/PoS consensus that improves scalability while maintaining security.
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Questions**:
|
||||
- How can we reduce energy consumption while maintaining decentralization?
|
||||
- What is the optimal validator selection algorithm for hybrid systems?
|
||||
- How to achieve finality in sub-second times?
|
||||
- Can we implement dynamic stake weighting based on network participation?
|
||||
|
||||
**Milestones**:
|
||||
- Q1: Literature review and baseline analysis
|
||||
- Q2: Prototype hybrid consensus algorithm
|
||||
- Q3: Security analysis and formal verification
|
||||
- Q4: Testnet deployment and performance benchmarking
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverables**:
|
||||
- Hybrid Consensus Whitepaper
|
||||
- Open-source reference implementation
|
||||
- Security audit report
|
||||
- Performance benchmark results
|
||||
|
||||
#### 2. Scalability Solutions
|
||||
**Objective**: Investigate sharding and rollup architectures to scale beyond current limits.
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Questions**:
|
||||
- What is the optimal shard size and number for AITBC's use case?
|
||||
- How can we implement cross-shard communication efficiently?
|
||||
- Can we achieve horizontal scaling without compromising security?
|
||||
- What rollup strategies work best for AI workloads?
|
||||
|
||||
**Sub-Tracks**:
|
||||
- **Sharding**: State sharding, transaction sharding, cross-shard protocols
|
||||
- **Rollups**: ZK-rollups, Optimistic rollups, hybrid approaches
|
||||
- **Layer 2**: State channels, Plasma, sidechains
|
||||
|
||||
**Milestones**:
|
||||
- Q1: Architecture design and simulation
|
||||
- Q2: Sharding prototype implementation
|
||||
- Q3: Rollup integration testing
|
||||
- Q4: Performance optimization and stress testing
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3. Zero-Knowledge Applications
|
||||
**Objective**: Expand ZK proof applications for privacy and scalability.
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Questions**:
|
||||
- How can we optimize ZK proof generation for AI workloads?
|
||||
- What new privacy-preserving computations can be enabled?
|
||||
- Can we achieve recursive proof composition for complex workflows?
|
||||
- How to reduce proof verification costs?
|
||||
|
||||
**Applications**:
|
||||
- Confidential transactions
|
||||
- Privacy-preserving AI inference
|
||||
- Verifiable computation
|
||||
- Identity and credential systems
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4. Cross-Chain Interoperability
|
||||
**Objective**: Standardize interoperability and improve cross-chain protocols.
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Questions**:
|
||||
- What standards should be proposed for industry adoption?
|
||||
- How can we achieve trustless cross-chain communication?
|
||||
- Can we implement universal asset wrapping?
|
||||
- What security models are appropriate for cross-chain bridges?
|
||||
|
||||
#### 5. AI-Specific Optimizations
|
||||
**Objective**: Optimize blockchain for AI/ML workloads.
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Questions**:
|
||||
- How can we optimize data availability for AI training?
|
||||
- What consensus mechanisms work best for federated learning?
|
||||
- Can we implement verifiable AI model execution?
|
||||
- How to handle large model weights on-chain?
|
||||
|
||||
### Secondary Research Areas
|
||||
|
||||
#### 6. Governance Mechanisms
|
||||
- On-chain governance protocols
|
||||
- Voting power distribution
|
||||
- Proposal evaluation systems
|
||||
- Conflict resolution mechanisms
|
||||
|
||||
#### 7. Economic Models
|
||||
- Tokenomics for research consortium
|
||||
- Incentive alignment mechanisms
|
||||
- Sustainable funding models
|
||||
- Value capture strategies
|
||||
|
||||
#### 8. Security & Privacy
|
||||
- Advanced cryptographic primitives
|
||||
- Privacy-preserving analytics
|
||||
- Attack resistance analysis
|
||||
- Formal verification methods
|
||||
|
||||
## Operational Framework
|
||||
|
||||
### Research Process
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1. Proposal Submission
|
||||
- **Format**: 2-page research proposal
|
||||
- **Content**: Problem statement, methodology, timeline, budget
|
||||
- **Review**: Technical committee evaluation
|
||||
- **Approval**: Steering committee vote
|
||||
|
||||
#### 2. Research Execution
|
||||
- **Funding**: Disbursed based on milestones
|
||||
- **Oversight**: Working group lead + technical advisor
|
||||
- **Reporting**: Monthly progress reports
|
||||
- **Reviews**: Quarterly technical reviews
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3. Publication Process
|
||||
- **Internal Review**: Consortium peer review
|
||||
- **External Review**: Independent expert review
|
||||
- **Publication**: Whitepaper series, academic papers
|
||||
- **Patents**: Consortium IP policy applies
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4. Implementation
|
||||
- **Reference Implementation**: Open-source code
|
||||
- **Integration**: AITBC roadmap integration
|
||||
- **Testing**: Testnet deployment
|
||||
- **Adoption**: Industry partner implementation
|
||||
|
||||
### Collaboration Infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
#### Digital Platform
|
||||
- **Research Portal**: Central hub for all research activities
|
||||
- **Collaboration Tools**: Shared workspaces, video conferencing
|
||||
- **Document Management**: Version control for all research documents
|
||||
- **Communication**: Slack/Discord, mailing lists, forums
|
||||
|
||||
#### Physical Infrastructure
|
||||
- **Research Labs**: Partner university facilities
|
||||
- **Testnet Environment**: Dedicated research testnet
|
||||
- **Computing Resources**: GPU clusters for ZK research
|
||||
- **Meeting Facilities**: Annual summit venue
|
||||
|
||||
### Intellectual Property Policy
|
||||
|
||||
#### IP Ownership
|
||||
- **Background IP**: Remains with owner
|
||||
- **Consortium IP**: Joint ownership, royalty-free for members
|
||||
- **Derived IP**: Negotiated on case-by-case basis
|
||||
- **Open Source**: Reference implementations open source
|
||||
|
||||
#### Licensing
|
||||
- **Commercial License**: Available to non-members
|
||||
- **Academic License**: Free for research institutions
|
||||
- **Implementation License**: Included with membership
|
||||
- **Patent Pool**: Managed by consortium
|
||||
|
||||
## Funding Model
|
||||
|
||||
### Budget Structure
|
||||
|
||||
#### Annual Budget: $10M
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Funding (60%)**: $6M
|
||||
- Consensus Research: $2M
|
||||
- Scaling Solutions: $2M
|
||||
- ZK Applications: $1M
|
||||
- Cross-Chain: $1M
|
||||
|
||||
**Operations (25%)**: $2.5M
|
||||
- Staff: $1.5M
|
||||
- Infrastructure: $500K
|
||||
- Events: $300K
|
||||
- Administration: $200K
|
||||
|
||||
**Contingency (15%)**: $1.5M
|
||||
- Emergency research
|
||||
- Opportunity funding
|
||||
- Reserve fund
|
||||
|
||||
### Funding Sources
|
||||
|
||||
#### Membership Fees
|
||||
- Founding Members: $2.5M (5 × $500K)
|
||||
- Research Partners: $2M (20 × $100K)
|
||||
- Associate Members: $1M (40 × $25K)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Grants
|
||||
- Government research grants
|
||||
- Foundation support
|
||||
- Corporate sponsorship
|
||||
|
||||
#### Revenue
|
||||
- Licensing fees
|
||||
- Service fees
|
||||
- Event revenue
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline & Milestones
|
||||
|
||||
### Year 1: Foundation
|
||||
- **Q1**: Consortium formation, member recruitment
|
||||
- **Q2**: Research council establishment, initial proposals
|
||||
- **Q3**: First research projects kick off
|
||||
- **Q4**: Initial whitepapers published
|
||||
|
||||
### Year 2: Expansion
|
||||
- **Q1**: New research tracks added
|
||||
- **Q2**: Industry partnerships expanded
|
||||
- **Q3**: Testnet deployment of prototypes
|
||||
- **Q4**: First implementations in production
|
||||
|
||||
### Year 3: Maturity
|
||||
- **Q1**: Standardization proposals submitted
|
||||
- **Q2**: Cross-industry adoption begins
|
||||
- **Q3**: Research outcomes commercialized
|
||||
- **Q4**: Consortium self-sustainability achieved
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
### Research Metrics
|
||||
- **Whitepapers Published**: 10 per year
|
||||
- **Patents Filed**: 5 per year
|
||||
- **Academic Papers**: 20 per year
|
||||
- **Citations**: 500+ per year
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Metrics
|
||||
- **Prototypes Deployed**: 5 per year
|
||||
- **Production Integrations**: 3 per year
|
||||
- **Performance Improvements**: 2x throughput
|
||||
- **Security Audits**: All major releases
|
||||
|
||||
### Community Metrics
|
||||
- **Active Researchers**: 50+
|
||||
- **Partner Organizations**: 30+
|
||||
- **Event Attendance**: 500+ annually
|
||||
- **Developer Adoption**: 1000+ projects
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Management
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Risks
|
||||
- **Research Dead Ends**: Diversify research portfolio
|
||||
- **Implementation Challenges**: Early prototyping
|
||||
- **Security Vulnerabilities**: Formal verification
|
||||
- **Performance Issues**: Continuous benchmarking
|
||||
|
||||
### Organizational Risks
|
||||
- **Member Attrition**: Value demonstration
|
||||
- **Funding Shortfalls**: Diverse revenue streams
|
||||
- **Coordination Issues**: Clear governance
|
||||
- **IP Disputes**: Clear policies
|
||||
|
||||
### External Risks
|
||||
- **Regulatory Changes**: Legal monitoring
|
||||
- **Market Shifts**: Agile research agenda
|
||||
- **Competition**: Unique value proposition
|
||||
- **Technology Changes**: Future-proofing
|
||||
|
||||
## Communication Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### Internal Communication
|
||||
- **Monthly Newsletter**: Research updates
|
||||
- **Quarterly Reports**: Progress summaries
|
||||
- **Annual Summit**: In-person collaboration
|
||||
- **Working Groups**: Regular meetings
|
||||
|
||||
### External Communication
|
||||
- **Whitepaper Series**: Public research outputs
|
||||
- **Blog Posts**: Accessible explanations
|
||||
- **Conference Presentations**: Academic dissemination
|
||||
- **Press Releases**: Major announcements
|
||||
|
||||
### Community Engagement
|
||||
- **Developer Workshops**: Technical training
|
||||
- **Hackathons**: Innovation challenges
|
||||
- **Open Source Contributions**: Community involvement
|
||||
- **Educational Programs**: Student engagement
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
### Immediate Actions (Next 30 Days)
|
||||
1. Finalize consortium bylaws and governance documents
|
||||
2. Recruit founding members (target: 5 industry, 5 academic)
|
||||
3. Establish legal entity and banking
|
||||
4. Hire executive director and core staff
|
||||
|
||||
### Short-term Goals (Next 90 Days)
|
||||
1. Launch research portal and collaboration tools
|
||||
2. Approve first batch of research proposals
|
||||
3. Host inaugural consortium summit
|
||||
4. Publish initial research roadmap
|
||||
|
||||
### Long-term Vision (Next 12 Months)
|
||||
1. Establish AITBC as thought leader in consensus research
|
||||
2. Deliver 10+ high-impact research papers
|
||||
3. Implement 3+ major innovations in production
|
||||
4. Grow to 50+ active research participants
|
||||
|
||||
## Contact Information
|
||||
|
||||
**Consortium Office**: research@aitbc.io
|
||||
**Executive Director**: director@aitbc.io
|
||||
**Research Inquiries**: proposals@aitbc.io
|
||||
**Partnership Opportunities**: partners@aitbc.io
|
||||
**Media Inquiries**: media@aitbc.io
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*This framework is a living document that will evolve as the consortium grows and learns. Regular reviews and updates will ensure the consortium remains effective and relevant.*
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user