## RFC Type
- [ ] Protocol (P)
- [ ] API (A)
- [ ] Ecosystem (E)
- [ ] Governance (G)
- [ ] Network (N)

## Required Information

**RFC Number**: _Assigned by maintainers_

**Title**: _Clear and descriptive title_

**Authors**: _GitHub usernames, comma separated_

**Status**: Draft

**Start Date**: YYYY-MM-DD

**Summary**

_One-paragraph summary of the proposal. What is being changed and why?_

## Motivation

_Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? Who are the stakeholders?_

## Detailed Design

_Provide a comprehensive technical specification. Include:_

- Architecture diagrams (if applicable)
- API changes
- Data model changes
- Protocol modifications
- Implementation details

## Rationale and Alternatives

_Why this approach over alternatives? What other approaches were considered?_

## Impact

_Effects on existing systems:_

- Breaking changes
- Migration requirements
- Backward compatibility
- Ecosystem impact

## Security Considerations

_Security implications and mitigations:_

- Attack vectors
- Privacy implications
- Audit requirements
- Compliance considerations

## Testing Strategy

_How will this be tested?_

- Unit tests
- Integration tests
- Security audits
- Performance testing
- Testnet deployment

## Unresolved Questions

_Open issues to be resolved:_

- Technical questions
- Implementation concerns
- Dependencies
- Timeline considerations

## Implementation Plan

_Timeline and milestones:_

- Phase 1: [description] - [date]
- Phase 2: [description] - [date]
- Phase 3: [description] - [date]

## Checklist

- [ ] I have read the [RFC Process](https://aitbc.io/rfc-process)
- [ ] I have searched for existing RFCs to avoid duplicates
- [ ] I have discussed this idea in a GitHub issue first
- [ ] I have addressed all required sections
- [ ] I have considered security implications
- [ ] I have included a testing strategy
- [ ] I am prepared to respond to feedback
- [ ] I understand this is a public document

## Additional Context

_Any additional information, links, or references that help reviewers understand the proposal._

---

### Review Process

1. **Initial Review** (2 weeks minimum)
   - Technical review by core team
   - Community feedback period
   - Security assessment

2. **Final Comment Period** (10 days)
   - Last call for objections
   - All issues must be addressed
   - Decision finalization

3. **Decision**
   - Accepted: Implementation begins
   - Rejected: Documented with reasoning
   - Deferred: Returned for revisions

### Review Guidelines

- Provide constructive, technical feedback
- Consider ecosystem impact
- Suggest improvements and alternatives
- Be respectful and professional

### Resources

- [RFC Process Documentation](https://aitbc.io/rfc-process)
- [Active RFCs](https://aitbc.io/active-rfcs)
- [Community Guidelines](https://aitbc.io/community)
- [Security Guidelines](https://aitbc.io/security)