Files
aitbc/dev/env/node_modules/ansi-regex
aitbc 816e258d4c refactor: move brother_node development artifact to dev/test-nodes subdirectory
Development Artifact Cleanup:
 BROTHER_NODE REORGANIZATION: Moved development test node to appropriate location
- dev/test-nodes/brother_node/: Moved from root directory for better organization
- Contains development configuration, test logs, and test chain data
- No impact on production systems - purely development/testing artifact

 DEVELOPMENT ARTIFACTS IDENTIFIED:
- Chain ID: aitbc-brother-chain (test/development chain)
- Ports: 8010 (P2P) and 8011 (RPC) - different from production
- Environment: .env file with test configuration
- Logs: rpc.log and node.log from development testing session (March 15, 2026)

 ROOT DIRECTORY CLEANUP: Removed development clutter from production directory
- brother_node/ moved to dev/test-nodes/brother_node/
- Root directory now contains only production-ready components
- Development artifacts properly organized in dev/ subdirectory

DIRECTORY STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT:
📁 dev/test-nodes/: Development and testing node configurations
🏗️ Root Directory: Clean production structure with only essential components
🧪 Development Isolation: Test environments separated from production

BENEFITS:
 Clean Production Directory: No development artifacts in root
 Better Organization: Development nodes grouped in dev/ subdirectory
 Clear Separation: Production vs development environments clearly distinguished
 Maintainability: Easier to identify and manage development components

RESULT: Successfully moved brother_node development artifact to dev/test-nodes/ subdirectory, cleaning up the root directory while preserving development testing environment for future use.
2026-03-30 17:09:06 +02:00
..

ansi-regex

Regular expression for matching ANSI escape codes

Install

$ npm install ansi-regex

Usage

const ansiRegex = require('ansi-regex');

ansiRegex().test('\u001B[4mcake\u001B[0m');
//=> true

ansiRegex().test('cake');
//=> false

'\u001B[4mcake\u001B[0m'.match(ansiRegex());
//=> ['\u001B[4m', '\u001B[0m']

'\u001B[4mcake\u001B[0m'.match(ansiRegex({onlyFirst: true}));
//=> ['\u001B[4m']

'\u001B]8;;https://github.com\u0007click\u001B]8;;\u0007'.match(ansiRegex());
//=> ['\u001B]8;;https://github.com\u0007', '\u001B]8;;\u0007']

API

ansiRegex(options?)

Returns a regex for matching ANSI escape codes.

options

Type: object

onlyFirst

Type: boolean
Default: false (Matches any ANSI escape codes in a string)

Match only the first ANSI escape.

FAQ

Why do you test for codes not in the ECMA 48 standard?

Some of the codes we run as a test are codes that we acquired finding various lists of non-standard or manufacturer specific codes. We test for both standard and non-standard codes, as most of them follow the same or similar format and can be safely matched in strings without the risk of removing actual string content. There are a few non-standard control codes that do not follow the traditional format (i.e. they end in numbers) thus forcing us to exclude them from the test because we cannot reliably match them.

On the historical side, those ECMA standards were established in the early 90's whereas the VT100, for example, was designed in the mid/late 70's. At that point in time, control codes were still pretty ungoverned and engineers used them for a multitude of things, namely to activate hardware ports that may have been proprietary. Somewhere else you see a similar 'anarchy' of codes is in the x86 architecture for processors; there are a ton of "interrupts" that can mean different things on certain brands of processors, most of which have been phased out.

Maintainers


Get professional support for this package with a Tidelift subscription
Tidelift helps make open source sustainable for maintainers while giving companies
assurances about security, maintenance, and licensing for their dependencies.