Files
aitbc/.windsurf/skills/openclaw-performance-optimizer.md
aitbc f36fd45d28
Some checks failed
Blockchain Synchronization Verification / sync-verification (push) Successful in 4s
Documentation Validation / validate-docs (push) Successful in 12s
Documentation Validation / validate-policies-strict (push) Successful in 3s
Integration Tests / test-service-integration (push) Failing after 12s
Multi-Node Blockchain Health Monitoring / health-check (push) Successful in 3s
P2P Network Verification / p2p-verification (push) Successful in 2s
Python Tests / test-python (push) Successful in 10s
Security Scanning / security-scan (push) Successful in 31s
Implement RECEIPT_CLAIM transaction type
- Add status fields to Receipt model (status, claimed_at, claimed_by)
- Add RECEIPT_CLAIM handling to state_transition.py with validation and reward minting
- Add type field to Transaction model for reliable transaction type storage
- Update router to use TransactionRequest model to preserve type field
- Update poa.py to extract type from mempool transaction content and store only original payload
- Add RECEIPT_CLAIM to GasType enum with gas schedule
2026-04-22 13:35:31 +02:00

161 lines
4.0 KiB
Markdown

---
description: Atomic OpenClaw agent performance tuning and optimization with deterministic outputs
title: openclaw-performance-optimizer
version: 1.1
---
# OpenClaw Performance Optimizer
## Purpose
Optimize agent performance, tune execution parameters, and improve efficiency for OpenClaw agents through systematic analysis and adjustment.
## Activation
Trigger when user requests performance optimization: agent tuning, parameter adjustment, efficiency improvements, or performance benchmarking.
## Input
```json
{
"operation": "tune|benchmark|optimize|profile",
"agent": "agent_name",
"target": "speed|memory|throughput|latency|all",
"parameters": {
"max_tokens": "number (optional)",
"temperature": "number (optional)",
"timeout": "number (optional)"
}
}
```
## Output
```json
{
"summary": "Agent performance optimization completed successfully",
"operation": "tune|benchmark|optimize|profile",
"agent": "agent_name",
"target": "speed|memory|throughput|latency|all",
"before_metrics": {
"execution_time": "number",
"memory_usage": "number",
"throughput": "number",
"latency": "number"
},
"after_metrics": {
"execution_time": "number",
"memory_usage": "number",
"throughput": "number",
"latency": "number"
},
"improvement": {
"speed": "percentage",
"memory": "percentage",
"throughput": "percentage",
"latency": "percentage"
},
"issues": [],
"recommendations": [],
"confidence": 1.0,
"execution_time": "number",
"validation_status": "success|partial|failed"
}
```
## Process
### 1. Analyze
- Profile current agent performance
- Identify bottlenecks
- Assess optimization opportunities
- Validate agent state
### 2. Plan
- Select optimization strategy
- Define parameter adjustments
- Set performance targets
- Plan validation approach
### 3. Execute
- Apply parameter adjustments
- Run performance benchmarks
- Measure improvements
- Validate stability
### 4. Validate
- Verify performance gains
- Check for regressions
- Validate parameter stability
- Confirm agent functionality
## Constraints
- **MUST NOT** modify agent core functionality
- **MUST NOT** exceed 90 seconds for optimization
- **MUST** validate parameter ranges
- **MUST** preserve agent behavior
- **MUST** rollback on critical failures
## Environment Assumptions
- Agent operational and accessible
- Performance monitoring available
- Parameter configuration accessible
- Benchmarking tools available
- Agent state persistence functional
## Error Handling
- Parameter validation failure → Revert to previous parameters
- Performance regression → Rollback optimization
- Agent instability → Restore baseline configuration
- Timeout during optimization → Return partial results
## Example Usage Prompt
```
Optimize main agent for speed and memory efficiency
```
## Expected Output Example
```json
{
"summary": "Main agent optimized for speed and memory efficiency",
"operation": "optimize",
"agent": "main",
"target": "all",
"before_metrics": {
"execution_time": 15.2,
"memory_usage": 250,
"throughput": 8.5,
"latency": 2.1
},
"after_metrics": {
"execution_time": 11.8,
"memory_usage": 180,
"throughput": 12.3,
"latency": 1.5
},
"improvement": {
"speed": "22%",
"memory": "28%",
"throughput": "45%",
"latency": "29%"
},
"issues": [],
"recommendations": ["Consider further optimization for memory-intensive tasks"],
"confidence": 1.0,
"execution_time": 35.7,
"validation_status": "success"
}
```
## Model Routing Suggestion
**Reasoning Model** (Claude Sonnet, GPT-4)
- Complex parameter optimization
- Performance analysis and tuning
- Benchmark interpretation
- Regression detection
**Performance Notes**
- **Execution Time**: 20-60 seconds for optimization, 5-15 seconds for benchmarking
- **Memory Usage**: <200MB for optimization operations
- **Network Requirements**: Agent communication for profiling
- **Concurrency**: Safe for sequential optimization of different agents