Some checks failed
Blockchain Synchronization Verification / sync-verification (push) Failing after 8s
CLI Tests / test-cli (push) Successful in 10s
Contract Performance Benchmarks / benchmark-gas-usage (push) Successful in 1m22s
Contract Performance Benchmarks / benchmark-execution-time (push) Successful in 1m11s
Contract Performance Benchmarks / benchmark-throughput (push) Successful in 1m13s
Cross-Chain Functionality Tests / test-cross-chain-sync (push) Failing after 5s
Cross-Chain Functionality Tests / test-cross-chain-transactions (push) Successful in 5s
Cross-Chain Functionality Tests / test-cross-chain-bridge (push) Has been skipped
Cross-Chain Functionality Tests / test-multi-chain-consensus (push) Failing after 3s
Cross-Chain Functionality Tests / aggregate-results (push) Has been skipped
Cross-Node Transaction Testing / transaction-test (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy to Testnet / deploy-testnet (push) Successful in 1m14s
Contract Performance Benchmarks / compare-benchmarks (push) Has been cancelled
Documentation Validation / validate-docs (push) Failing after 10s
Multi-Node Stress Testing / stress-test (push) Has been cancelled
Node Failover Simulation / failover-test (push) Has been cancelled
Security Scanning / security-scan (push) Has been cancelled
Smart Contract Tests / test-solidity (map[name:aitbc-contracts path:contracts]) (push) Has been cancelled
Smart Contract Tests / test-solidity (map[name:aitbc-token path:packages/solidity/aitbc-token]) (push) Has been cancelled
Smart Contract Tests / test-foundry (push) Has been cancelled
Smart Contract Tests / lint-solidity (push) Has been cancelled
Smart Contract Tests / deploy-contracts (push) Has been cancelled
Documentation Validation / validate-policies-strict (push) Successful in 3s
Integration Tests / test-service-integration (push) Failing after 45s
Multi-Chain Island Architecture Tests / test-multi-chain-island (push) Failing after 2s
Multi-Node Blockchain Health Monitoring / health-check (push) Successful in 5s
P2P Network Verification / p2p-verification (push) Successful in 3s
Production Tests / Production Integration Tests (push) Failing after 7s
Python Tests / test-python (push) Failing after 46s
Staking Tests / test-staking-service (push) Failing after 2s
Staking Tests / test-staking-integration (push) Has been skipped
Staking Tests / test-staking-contract (push) Has been skipped
Staking Tests / run-staking-test-runner (push) Has been skipped
Systemd Sync / sync-systemd (push) Successful in 21s
API Endpoint Tests / test-api-endpoints (push) Failing after 12m19s
- Changed pytest calls to use `venv/bin/python -m pytest` with explicit config - Added `--rootdir "$PWD"` and `--import-mode=importlib` for consistent imports - Fixed PYTHONPATH to use absolute paths with $PWD prefix - Added smart contract security scanning for Solidity files - Added Circom circuit security checks for ZK proof circuits - Added ZK proof implementation security validation - Added contracts/** to security scanning workflow
257 lines
8.4 KiB
Markdown
257 lines
8.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
description: Security & Audit Workflow for AITBC Platform
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Security & Audit Workflow
|
|
|
|
This workflow covers comprehensive security auditing and review for the AITBC platform.
|
|
|
|
## Status Summary
|
|
|
|
**Initial Audit Phase:** ✅ Completed (2026-05-11)
|
|
|
|
The initial internal security audit has been completed with the following deliverables:
|
|
- Security findings documented (20 findings: 3 Critical, 10 High, 7 Medium)
|
|
- Threat model created
|
|
- Economic analysis completed
|
|
- Remediation plan developed
|
|
- CI/CD security scanning enhanced
|
|
|
|
**Remediation Implementation:** ✅ Partially Completed (2026-05-11)
|
|
- **Phase 1 (Critical):** ✅ Complete (3/3 findings resolved)
|
|
- ECDSA verification bypass - Mitigated
|
|
- Mock ZK proof verification - Resolved
|
|
- Unlimited token minting - Resolved
|
|
|
|
- **Phase 2 (High):** 🔄 Partial (5/10 findings resolved, 5 deferred)
|
|
- ✅ Circom circuit constraints (3 findings) - Resolved
|
|
- ✅ ZK proof implementation security (5 findings) - Resolved/Mitigated
|
|
- ⏸️ Smart contract economic security (5 findings) - Deferred to dedicated sprint
|
|
|
|
- **Phase 3 (Medium):** ⏸️ Deferred (0/7 findings resolved, 7 deferred)
|
|
- All Medium findings require smart contract upgrades
|
|
- Deferred to dedicated smart contract security sprint
|
|
|
|
**Smart Contract Security Sprint:** ⏳ Not Started
|
|
- Scope: 8 deferred findings (5 High, 3 Medium)
|
|
- Components: AgentStaking.sol, AIServiceAMM.sol, EscrowService.sol
|
|
- Requires: Contract development, testing, migration strategy, governance approval
|
|
|
|
**Third-Party Audit:** Not yet initiated - pending completion of non-smart-contract remediations
|
|
|
|
## Prerequisites
|
|
|
|
- Access to all source code repositories
|
|
- Documentation of system architecture
|
|
- List of third-party dependencies
|
|
- Smart contract source code
|
|
- Circom circuit source code
|
|
- Budget for third-party security audit (if applicable)
|
|
|
|
## Steps
|
|
|
|
### 1. Professional Third-Party Security Audit
|
|
|
|
1. **Select security audit firm**
|
|
- Research reputable blockchain security firms
|
|
- Evaluate expertise in: smart contracts, ZK proofs, zero-knowledge systems
|
|
- Compare pricing and timelines
|
|
- Check references and past audits
|
|
|
|
2. **Prepare audit scope**
|
|
- Define components to audit:
|
|
- Smart contracts (Solidity)
|
|
- ZK circuits (Circom)
|
|
- Coordinator API (Python/FastAPI)
|
|
- Blockchain node (Python)
|
|
- Wallet daemon (Python)
|
|
- Define audit timeline and deliverables
|
|
- Prepare architecture documentation
|
|
- Provide threat model documentation
|
|
|
|
3. **Engage audit firm**
|
|
- Sign NDAs and contracts
|
|
- Provide access to code repositories
|
|
- Schedule kickoff meeting
|
|
- Define communication channels
|
|
|
|
4. **Review audit findings**
|
|
- Receive audit report
|
|
- Categorize findings by severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low)
|
|
- Review each finding with engineering team
|
|
- Estimate remediation effort
|
|
|
|
5. **Implement security fixes**
|
|
- Create issue tickets for each finding
|
|
- Prioritize Critical and High findings
|
|
- Implement fixes with proper testing
|
|
- Document remediation steps
|
|
|
|
6. **Re-audit**
|
|
- Submit fixed code for re-audit
|
|
- Verify all findings are resolved
|
|
- Obtain final audit report
|
|
- Publish audit summary (if appropriate)
|
|
|
|
### 2. Circom Circuit Security Review
|
|
|
|
1. **Circuit code review**
|
|
- Review all Circom circuits in `apps/zk-circuits/`
|
|
- Check for common vulnerabilities:
|
|
- Arithmetic overflow/underflow
|
|
- Incorrect constraint definitions
|
|
- Side-channel attacks
|
|
- Privacy leaks
|
|
- Verify circuit correctness with test vectors
|
|
|
|
2. **Constraint analysis**
|
|
- Analyze constraint complexity
|
|
- Check for unnecessary constraints
|
|
- Verify witness generation correctness
|
|
- Test circuit with edge cases
|
|
|
|
3. **Proving system review**
|
|
- Review Groth16 proving key generation
|
|
- Verify trusted setup ceremony process
|
|
- Check verification key security
|
|
- Test proof generation and verification
|
|
|
|
4. **Performance optimization**
|
|
- Analyze circuit size and proving time
|
|
- Optimize constraint count
|
|
- Implement circuit caching
|
|
- Benchmark proving performance
|
|
|
|
### 3. ZK Proof Implementation Audit
|
|
|
|
1. **API endpoint security**
|
|
- Review ZK proof endpoints in coordinator API
|
|
- Check input validation
|
|
- Verify proof verification logic
|
|
- Test with malicious inputs
|
|
|
|
2. **Circuit integration review**
|
|
- Review integration of Circom circuits with Python
|
|
- Check witness generation security
|
|
- Verify proof serialization/deserialization
|
|
- Test proof verification pipeline
|
|
|
|
3. **Privacy verification**
|
|
- Verify zero-knowledge properties
|
|
- Check that sensitive data is not leaked
|
|
- Test with privacy-sensitive scenarios
|
|
- Verify confidentiality guarantees
|
|
|
|
4. **Error handling**
|
|
- Review error messages for information leaks
|
|
- Test error paths
|
|
- Verify graceful degradation
|
|
- Check logging sensitivity
|
|
|
|
### 4. Token Economy and Attack Vector Review
|
|
|
|
✅ **COMPLETED** (2026-05-11)
|
|
|
|
1. **Economic model analysis**
|
|
- ✅ Reviewed token distribution and vesting
|
|
- ✅ Analyzed incentive mechanisms
|
|
- ✅ Checked for economic attack vectors:
|
|
- Pump and dump
|
|
- Front-running
|
|
- MEV extraction
|
|
- Sybil attacks
|
|
|
|
2. **Smart contract economic security**
|
|
- ✅ Reviewed staking mechanisms
|
|
- ✅ Checked reward distribution logic
|
|
- ✅ Verified slashing conditions
|
|
- ✅ Analyzed governance token economics
|
|
|
|
3. **Market manipulation prevention**
|
|
- ✅ Reviewed marketplace pricing mechanisms
|
|
- ✅ Checked for oracle manipulation risks
|
|
- ✅ Verified liquidity protection
|
|
- ✅ Analyzed arbitrage opportunities
|
|
|
|
4. **Game theory analysis**
|
|
- ✅ Analyzed Nash equilibria
|
|
- ✅ Checked for dominant strategies
|
|
- ✅ Verified incentive alignment
|
|
- ⏳ Test economic simulations (pending)
|
|
|
|
**Findings:** 9 issues documented in `docs/security/audit-findings.md`
|
|
|
|
### 5. Security Findings Documentation and Remediation
|
|
|
|
1. **Create security findings document**
|
|
- Document: `docs/security/audit-findings.md`
|
|
- Structure by component and severity
|
|
- Include: description, impact, remediation, status
|
|
- Track remediation progress
|
|
|
|
2. **Create remediation plan**
|
|
- Prioritize findings by severity
|
|
- Assign owners and timelines
|
|
- Create issue tickets
|
|
- Track progress in project management tool
|
|
|
|
3. **Implement fixes**
|
|
- Fix Critical findings first
|
|
- Add comprehensive tests for fixes
|
|
- Perform regression testing
|
|
- Update documentation
|
|
|
|
4. **Security hardening**
|
|
- Implement defense in depth
|
|
- Add additional security layers
|
|
- Improve monitoring and alerting
|
|
- Update security policies
|
|
|
|
5. **Post-audit improvements**
|
|
- Update development practices
|
|
- Add security testing to CI/CD
|
|
- Implement security training
|
|
- Establish security review process
|
|
|
|
## Verification
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Third-party audit firm selected and engaged
|
|
- [ ] Audit scope defined and documented
|
|
- [ ] Circom circuits reviewed and optimized
|
|
- [ ] ZK proof implementation audited
|
|
- [ ] Token economy analyzed for attack vectors
|
|
- [ ] Security findings documented
|
|
- [ ] Critical and High findings remediated
|
|
- [ ] Re-audit completed and findings resolved
|
|
- [ ] Security hardening implemented
|
|
- [ ] Security practices updated
|
|
|
|
## Troubleshooting
|
|
|
|
- **Audit firm unavailable**: Expand search to include more firms, consider remote audit firms
|
|
- **Circuit review finds issues**: Consult Circom community, review best practices, consider circuit redesign
|
|
- **Economic model vulnerabilities**: Consult economic experts, consider simulation testing, adjust incentives
|
|
- **Remediation blocked**: Escalate to management, prioritize critical fixes, consider temporary mitigations
|
|
|
|
## Related Files
|
|
|
|
**Source Code:**
|
|
- `apps/zk-circuits/*.circom`
|
|
- `apps/coordinator-api/src/app/routers/zk_applications.py`
|
|
- `apps/coordinator-api/src/app/routers/ml_zk_proofs.py`
|
|
- `apps/coordinator-api/src/app/services/zk_proofs.py`
|
|
- `apps/coordinator-api/src/app/services/zk_memory_verification.py`
|
|
- `contracts/contracts/AIToken.sol`
|
|
- `contracts/contracts/AgentStaking.sol`
|
|
- `contracts/contracts/AIServiceAMM.sol`
|
|
- `contracts/contracts/EscrowService.sol`
|
|
|
|
**Security Documentation:**
|
|
- `docs/security/audit-findings.md` - All 20 security findings
|
|
- `docs/security/threat-model.md` - Comprehensive threat model
|
|
- `docs/security/economic-analysis.md` - Economic security analysis
|
|
- `docs/security/remediation-plan.md` - 3-phase remediation plan
|
|
|
|
**CI/CD:**
|
|
- `.gitea/workflows/security-scanning.yml` - Enhanced security scanning workflow
|