Some checks failed
Blockchain Synchronization Verification / sync-verification (push) Failing after 8s
CLI Tests / test-cli (push) Successful in 10s
Contract Performance Benchmarks / benchmark-gas-usage (push) Successful in 1m22s
Contract Performance Benchmarks / benchmark-execution-time (push) Successful in 1m11s
Contract Performance Benchmarks / benchmark-throughput (push) Successful in 1m13s
Cross-Chain Functionality Tests / test-cross-chain-sync (push) Failing after 5s
Cross-Chain Functionality Tests / test-cross-chain-transactions (push) Successful in 5s
Cross-Chain Functionality Tests / test-cross-chain-bridge (push) Has been skipped
Cross-Chain Functionality Tests / test-multi-chain-consensus (push) Failing after 3s
Cross-Chain Functionality Tests / aggregate-results (push) Has been skipped
Cross-Node Transaction Testing / transaction-test (push) Successful in 5s
Deploy to Testnet / deploy-testnet (push) Successful in 1m14s
Contract Performance Benchmarks / compare-benchmarks (push) Has been cancelled
Documentation Validation / validate-docs (push) Failing after 10s
Multi-Node Stress Testing / stress-test (push) Has been cancelled
Node Failover Simulation / failover-test (push) Has been cancelled
Security Scanning / security-scan (push) Has been cancelled
Smart Contract Tests / test-solidity (map[name:aitbc-contracts path:contracts]) (push) Has been cancelled
Smart Contract Tests / test-solidity (map[name:aitbc-token path:packages/solidity/aitbc-token]) (push) Has been cancelled
Smart Contract Tests / test-foundry (push) Has been cancelled
Smart Contract Tests / lint-solidity (push) Has been cancelled
Smart Contract Tests / deploy-contracts (push) Has been cancelled
Documentation Validation / validate-policies-strict (push) Successful in 3s
Integration Tests / test-service-integration (push) Failing after 45s
Multi-Chain Island Architecture Tests / test-multi-chain-island (push) Failing after 2s
Multi-Node Blockchain Health Monitoring / health-check (push) Successful in 5s
P2P Network Verification / p2p-verification (push) Successful in 3s
Production Tests / Production Integration Tests (push) Failing after 7s
Python Tests / test-python (push) Failing after 46s
Staking Tests / test-staking-service (push) Failing after 2s
Staking Tests / test-staking-integration (push) Has been skipped
Staking Tests / test-staking-contract (push) Has been skipped
Staking Tests / run-staking-test-runner (push) Has been skipped
Systemd Sync / sync-systemd (push) Successful in 21s
API Endpoint Tests / test-api-endpoints (push) Failing after 12m19s
- Changed pytest calls to use `venv/bin/python -m pytest` with explicit config - Added `--rootdir "$PWD"` and `--import-mode=importlib` for consistent imports - Fixed PYTHONPATH to use absolute paths with $PWD prefix - Added smart contract security scanning for Solidity files - Added Circom circuit security checks for ZK proof circuits - Added ZK proof implementation security validation - Added contracts/** to security scanning workflow
343 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
343 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
# Third-Party Security Audit Scope
|
|
|
|
**Document Version:** 1.0
|
|
**Date:** 2026-05-11
|
|
**Status:** Ready for Audit Firm Review
|
|
|
|
## Executive Summary
|
|
|
|
The AITBC platform has completed an internal security audit identifying 20 security findings across Critical, High, and Medium severity levels. This document defines the scope for third-party security audit, including completed remediations and pending smart contract security sprint.
|
|
|
|
**Total Findings:** 20 (3 Critical, 10 High, 7 Medium)
|
|
**Completed Remediations:** 8 findings (3 Critical, 5 High)
|
|
**Pending Remediations:** 12 findings (5 High, 7 Medium) - deferred to smart contract security sprint
|
|
|
|
## Audit Objectives
|
|
|
|
1. **Verify completed remediations** - Validate that 8 completed findings are properly resolved
|
|
2. **Audit smart contract security sprint** - Review planned remediations for 8 deferred findings
|
|
3. **Identify additional vulnerabilities** - Comprehensive security assessment beyond known findings
|
|
4. **Provide security recommendations** - Best practices and architectural improvements
|
|
|
|
## Audit Scope
|
|
|
|
### Phase 1: Completed Remediations Verification
|
|
|
|
#### Components to Audit
|
|
|
|
**1. Circom Circuits (3 findings resolved)**
|
|
- `apps/zk-circuits/receipt.circom`
|
|
- `apps/zk-circuits/ml_training_verification.circom`
|
|
- `apps/zk-circuits/ml_inference_verification.circom`
|
|
- `apps/zk-circuits/modular_ml_components.circom`
|
|
|
|
**Remediations to Verify:**
|
|
- ECDSA verification bypass mitigation (moved to API layer)
|
|
- Learning rate constraint fixes (proper comparison circuits)
|
|
- Verification logic fixes (IsZero circuit implementation)
|
|
- Learning rate validation re-implementation
|
|
|
|
**Test Cases:**
|
|
- Compile all modified circuits
|
|
- Verify constraint correctness
|
|
- Test with valid and invalid inputs
|
|
- Verify circuit soundness
|
|
|
|
**2. ZK Proof Implementation (5 findings resolved/mitigated)**
|
|
- `apps/coordinator-api/src/app/services/zk_proofs.py`
|
|
- `apps/coordinator-api/src/app/services/zk_memory_verification.py`
|
|
- `apps/coordinator-api/src/app/routers/zk_applications.py`
|
|
|
|
**Remediations to Verify:**
|
|
- Mock ZK proof verification replaced with actual Groth16 verification
|
|
- Mock proof generation disabled by default (enabled flag)
|
|
- Demo endpoints disabled by default (DEMO_MODE_ENABLED flag)
|
|
- Weak validation replaced with proper error handling
|
|
- Security warnings added for placeholder implementations
|
|
|
|
**Test Cases:**
|
|
- Test Groth16 verification with valid proofs
|
|
- Test disabled services return 503 errors
|
|
- Test enabled flag behavior
|
|
- Verify security warnings are logged
|
|
- Test input validation
|
|
|
|
**3. Smart Contract - AIToken.sol (1 finding resolved)**
|
|
- `contracts/contracts/AIToken.sol`
|
|
|
|
**Remediations to Verify:**
|
|
- MAX_SUPPLY constant (1 billion tokens)
|
|
- MINTING_COOLDOWN (1 day)
|
|
- Constructor validation (initial supply ≤ MAX_SUPPLY)
|
|
- Mint validation (totalSupply + amount ≤ MAX_SUPPLY)
|
|
- Mint validation (cooldown period elapsed)
|
|
|
|
**Test Cases:**
|
|
- Test minting respects supply cap
|
|
- Test minting cooldown enforcement
|
|
- Test constructor rejects invalid initial supply
|
|
- Test mint after cooldown succeeds
|
|
- Test mint before cooldown fails
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2: Smart Contract Security Sprint Audit
|
|
|
|
#### Components to Audit
|
|
|
|
**1. AgentStaking.sol (3 findings pending)**
|
|
- `contracts/contracts/AgentStaking.sol`
|
|
|
|
**Pending Remediations to Review:**
|
|
- SC-H-01: Slashing mechanism implementation
|
|
- SC-H-02: Oracle manipulation protection
|
|
- SC-M-03: Rate limiting on staking operations
|
|
|
|
**Audit Focus:**
|
|
- Slashing logic correctness
|
|
- Oracle authorization and signature verification
|
|
- Rate limiting implementation
|
|
- Economic incentive alignment
|
|
- Governance mechanisms
|
|
|
|
**Test Cases:**
|
|
- Slashing condition tests
|
|
- Oracle authorization tests
|
|
- Rate limiting tests
|
|
- Governance approval tests
|
|
- Edge case scenarios
|
|
|
|
**2. AIServiceAMM.sol (2 findings pending)**
|
|
- `contracts/contracts/AIServiceAMM.sol`
|
|
|
|
**Pending Remediations to Review:**
|
|
- SC-H-03: Flash loan attack protection (TWAP)
|
|
- SC-H-04: Front-running protection
|
|
- SC-H-05: Emergency withdraw timelock
|
|
|
|
**Audit Focus:**
|
|
- TWAP implementation correctness
|
|
- Flash loan detection mechanism
|
|
- Front-running mitigation (commit-reveal)
|
|
- Emergency withdraw timelock
|
|
- Circuit breaker implementation
|
|
- MEV resistance
|
|
|
|
**Test Cases:**
|
|
- Flash loan simulation
|
|
- Price manipulation tests
|
|
- Front-running simulation
|
|
- Commit-reveal tests
|
|
- Emergency withdraw delay tests
|
|
- Circuit breaker tests
|
|
|
|
**3. EscrowService.sol (2 findings pending)**
|
|
- `contracts/contracts/EscrowService.sol`
|
|
|
|
**Pending Remediations to Review:**
|
|
- SC-M-01: Multi-oracle verification
|
|
- SC-M-02: Minimum voting threshold
|
|
|
|
**Audit Focus:**
|
|
- Multi-oracle threshold implementation
|
|
- Oracle reputation system
|
|
- Dispute resolution mechanism
|
|
- Voting threshold calculation
|
|
- Arbiter staking mechanism
|
|
- Sybil attack prevention
|
|
|
|
**Test Cases:**
|
|
- Multi-oracle threshold tests
|
|
- Dispute resolution tests
|
|
- Voting threshold tests
|
|
- Arbiter staking tests
|
|
- Sybil attack simulation
|
|
|
|
### Phase 3: Comprehensive Security Assessment
|
|
|
|
#### Additional Components to Review
|
|
|
|
**1. Blockchain Node**
|
|
- `apps/blockchain-node/src/aitbc_chain/`
|
|
- State management
|
|
- Consensus mechanism
|
|
- Transaction processing
|
|
- P2P network security
|
|
|
|
**2. Coordinator API**
|
|
- `apps/coordinator-api/src/app/`
|
|
- Authentication and authorization
|
|
- API endpoint security
|
|
- Rate limiting
|
|
- Input validation
|
|
- Error handling
|
|
|
|
**3. Wallet Daemon**
|
|
- `apps/wallet/src/app/`
|
|
- Private key management
|
|
- Transaction signing
|
|
- Secure storage
|
|
- Key derivation
|
|
|
|
**4. Additional Smart Contracts**
|
|
- `contracts/contracts/` (all contracts not in scope above)
|
|
- Gas optimization
|
|
- Reentrancy protection
|
|
- Access control
|
|
- Upgradeability patterns
|
|
|
|
## Audit Deliverables
|
|
|
|
### 1. Audit Report
|
|
- Executive summary
|
|
- Detailed findings with severity classification
|
|
- Code references for each finding
|
|
- Remediation recommendations
|
|
- Risk assessment
|
|
|
|
### 2. Test Results
|
|
- Test case documentation
|
|
- Test execution results
|
|
- Coverage metrics
|
|
- Performance benchmarks
|
|
|
|
### 3. Security Recommendations
|
|
- Architecture improvements
|
|
- Best practices
|
|
- Additional security measures
|
|
- Monitoring and alerting recommendations
|
|
|
|
### 4. Re-audit Plan
|
|
- Scope for re-audit after remediation
|
|
- Verification checklist
|
|
- Success criteria
|
|
|
|
## Audit Methodology
|
|
|
|
### 1. Static Analysis
|
|
- Automated code scanning (Slither, MythX, etc.)
|
|
- Manual code review
|
|
- Pattern matching for common vulnerabilities
|
|
|
|
### 2. Dynamic Analysis
|
|
- Fuzzing
|
|
- Penetration testing
|
|
- Stress testing
|
|
- Performance testing
|
|
|
|
### 3. Formal Verification (if applicable)
|
|
- Smart contract formal verification
|
|
- Circuit correctness proofs
|
|
- Security property verification
|
|
|
|
### 4. Threat Modeling
|
|
- Identify attack vectors
|
|
- Assess impact of potential attacks
|
|
- Validate mitigations
|
|
|
|
## Audit Timeline
|
|
|
|
**Estimated Duration:** 4-6 weeks
|
|
|
|
- **Week 1:** Initial review, static analysis, threat modeling
|
|
- **Week 2:** Dynamic analysis, penetration testing
|
|
- **Week 3:** Smart contract deep dive, formal verification
|
|
- **Week 4:** Report preparation, recommendations
|
|
- **Week 5:** Review and revisions
|
|
- **Week 6:** Final report delivery
|
|
|
|
## Access Requirements
|
|
|
|
### Code Access
|
|
- Read access to all repositories
|
|
- Access to git history
|
|
- Access to CI/CD pipelines
|
|
|
|
### Documentation Access
|
|
- Architecture documentation
|
|
- API documentation
|
|
- Deployment documentation
|
|
- Security documentation
|
|
|
|
### Testing Environment
|
|
- Access to testnet deployment
|
|
- Test accounts with tokens
|
|
- Access to monitoring tools
|
|
|
|
## Communication
|
|
|
|
**Primary Contact:** [To be designated]
|
|
**Weekly Status Calls:** Yes
|
|
**Ad-hoc Questions:** Yes
|
|
**Progress Updates:** Weekly
|
|
|
|
## Success Criteria
|
|
|
|
1. **Coverage:** All components in scope audited
|
|
2. **Findings:** All findings documented with severity
|
|
3. **Recommendations:** Actionable remediation steps provided
|
|
4. **Timeline:** Audit completed within estimated duration
|
|
5. **Quality:** Audit report meets industry standards
|
|
|
|
## Exclusions
|
|
|
|
### Out of Scope
|
|
- Infrastructure security (AWS/GCP configuration)
|
|
- Network security (firewall rules, VPN)
|
|
- Physical security
|
|
- Social engineering
|
|
- Third-party dependencies (unless critical)
|
|
- Operational procedures
|
|
|
|
### Limitations
|
|
- Audit based on code at time of audit
|
|
- No guarantee against future vulnerabilities
|
|
- Limited to provided scope
|
|
- No penetration testing of production environment
|
|
|
|
## Appendix
|
|
|
|
### A. Completed Remediations Summary
|
|
|
|
| Finding ID | Component | Severity | Status | Remediation |
|
|
|------------|-----------|----------|--------|-------------|
|
|
| C-01 | receipt.circom | Critical | Mitigated | ECDSA verification moved to API |
|
|
| C-02 | zk_proofs.py | Critical | Resolved | Actual Groth16 verification |
|
|
| C-03 | AIToken.sol | Critical | Resolved | Supply cap + cooldown |
|
|
| H-01 | ml_training_verification.circom | High | Resolved | Proper comparison circuits |
|
|
| H-02 | ml_inference_verification.circom | High | Resolved | IsZero circuit |
|
|
| H-03 | modular_ml_components.circom | High | Resolved | Re-implemented validation |
|
|
| H-04 | zk_memory_verification.py | High | Mitigated | Disabled by default |
|
|
| H-05 | zk_applications.py | High | Resolved | Demo endpoints disabled |
|
|
|
|
### B. Pending Remediations Summary
|
|
|
|
| Finding ID | Component | Severity | Sprint ID | Status |
|
|
|------------|-----------|----------|-----------|--------|
|
|
| SC-H-01 | AgentStaking.sol | High | SC-H-01 | Pending |
|
|
| SC-H-02 | AgentStaking.sol | High | SC-H-02 | Pending |
|
|
| SC-H-03 | AIServiceAMM.sol | High | SC-H-03 | Pending |
|
|
| SC-H-04 | AIServiceAMM.sol | High | SC-H-04 | Pending |
|
|
| SC-H-05 | AIServiceAMM.sol | High | SC-H-05 | Pending |
|
|
| SC-M-01 | EscrowService.sol | Medium | SC-M-01 | Pending |
|
|
| SC-M-02 | EscrowService.sol | Medium | SC-M-02 | Pending |
|
|
| SC-M-03 | AgentStaking.sol | Medium | SC-M-03 | Pending |
|
|
|
|
### C. Related Documents
|
|
|
|
- `docs/security/audit-findings.md` - Detailed security findings
|
|
- `docs/security/threat-model.md` - Threat model
|
|
- `docs/security/economic-analysis.md` - Economic security analysis
|
|
- `docs/security/remediation-plan.md` - Remediation plan
|
|
- `.windsurf/plans/smart-contract-security-sprint.md` - Smart contract sprint plan
|
|
- `.windsurf/plans/security-audit-plan.md` - Security audit workflow
|
|
|
|
### D. Contact Information
|
|
|
|
**Project Team:**
|
|
- [To be designated] - Project Lead
|
|
- [To be designated] - Smart Contract Developer
|
|
- [To be designated] - Security Engineer
|
|
|
|
**Audit Firm:**
|
|
- [To be designated] - Lead Auditor
|
|
- [To be designated] - Audit Team
|