c8be9d7414
- Add Prometheus metrics for marketplace API throughput and error rates with new dashboard panels - Implement confidential transaction models with encryption support and access control - Add key management system with registration, rotation, and audit logging - Create services and registry routers for service discovery and management - Integrate ZK proof generation for privacy-preserving receipts - Add metrics instru
2.8 KiB
2.8 KiB
RFC Type
- Protocol (P)
- API (A)
- Ecosystem (E)
- Governance (G)
- Network (N)
Required Information
RFC Number: Assigned by maintainers
Title: Clear and descriptive title
Authors: GitHub usernames, comma separated
Status: Draft
Start Date: YYYY-MM-DD
Summary
One-paragraph summary of the proposal. What is being changed and why?
Motivation
Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? Who are the stakeholders?
Detailed Design
Provide a comprehensive technical specification. Include:
- Architecture diagrams (if applicable)
- API changes
- Data model changes
- Protocol modifications
- Implementation details
Rationale and Alternatives
Why this approach over alternatives? What other approaches were considered?
Impact
Effects on existing systems:
- Breaking changes
- Migration requirements
- Backward compatibility
- Ecosystem impact
Security Considerations
Security implications and mitigations:
- Attack vectors
- Privacy implications
- Audit requirements
- Compliance considerations
Testing Strategy
How will this be tested?
- Unit tests
- Integration tests
- Security audits
- Performance testing
- Testnet deployment
Unresolved Questions
Open issues to be resolved:
- Technical questions
- Implementation concerns
- Dependencies
- Timeline considerations
Implementation Plan
Timeline and milestones:
- Phase 1: [description] - [date]
- Phase 2: [description] - [date]
- Phase 3: [description] - [date]
Checklist
- I have read the RFC Process
- I have searched for existing RFCs to avoid duplicates
- I have discussed this idea in a GitHub issue first
- I have addressed all required sections
- I have considered security implications
- I have included a testing strategy
- I am prepared to respond to feedback
- I understand this is a public document
Additional Context
Any additional information, links, or references that help reviewers understand the proposal.
Review Process
-
Initial Review (2 weeks minimum)
- Technical review by core team
- Community feedback period
- Security assessment
-
Final Comment Period (10 days)
- Last call for objections
- All issues must be addressed
- Decision finalization
-
Decision
- Accepted: Implementation begins
- Rejected: Documented with reasoning
- Deferred: Returned for revisions
Review Guidelines
- Provide constructive, technical feedback
- Consider ecosystem impact
- Suggest improvements and alternatives
- Be respectful and professional