c8be9d7414
- Add Prometheus metrics for marketplace API throughput and error rates with new dashboard panels - Implement confidential transaction models with encryption support and access control - Add key management system with registration, rotation, and audit logging - Create services and registry routers for service discovery and management - Integrate ZK proof generation for privacy-preserving receipts - Add metrics instru
134 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
134 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
## RFC Type
|
|
- [ ] Protocol (P)
|
|
- [ ] API (A)
|
|
- [ ] Ecosystem (E)
|
|
- [ ] Governance (G)
|
|
- [ ] Network (N)
|
|
|
|
## Required Information
|
|
|
|
**RFC Number**: _Assigned by maintainers_
|
|
|
|
**Title**: _Clear and descriptive title_
|
|
|
|
**Authors**: _GitHub usernames, comma separated_
|
|
|
|
**Status**: Draft
|
|
|
|
**Start Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
|
|
|
|
**Summary**
|
|
|
|
_One-paragraph summary of the proposal. What is being changed and why?_
|
|
|
|
## Motivation
|
|
|
|
_Why is this change needed? What problem does it solve? Who are the stakeholders?_
|
|
|
|
## Detailed Design
|
|
|
|
_Provide a comprehensive technical specification. Include:_
|
|
|
|
- Architecture diagrams (if applicable)
|
|
- API changes
|
|
- Data model changes
|
|
- Protocol modifications
|
|
- Implementation details
|
|
|
|
## Rationale and Alternatives
|
|
|
|
_Why this approach over alternatives? What other approaches were considered?_
|
|
|
|
## Impact
|
|
|
|
_Effects on existing systems:_
|
|
|
|
- Breaking changes
|
|
- Migration requirements
|
|
- Backward compatibility
|
|
- Ecosystem impact
|
|
|
|
## Security Considerations
|
|
|
|
_Security implications and mitigations:_
|
|
|
|
- Attack vectors
|
|
- Privacy implications
|
|
- Audit requirements
|
|
- Compliance considerations
|
|
|
|
## Testing Strategy
|
|
|
|
_How will this be tested?_
|
|
|
|
- Unit tests
|
|
- Integration tests
|
|
- Security audits
|
|
- Performance testing
|
|
- Testnet deployment
|
|
|
|
## Unresolved Questions
|
|
|
|
_Open issues to be resolved:_
|
|
|
|
- Technical questions
|
|
- Implementation concerns
|
|
- Dependencies
|
|
- Timeline considerations
|
|
|
|
## Implementation Plan
|
|
|
|
_Timeline and milestones:_
|
|
|
|
- Phase 1: [description] - [date]
|
|
- Phase 2: [description] - [date]
|
|
- Phase 3: [description] - [date]
|
|
|
|
## Checklist
|
|
|
|
- [ ] I have read the [RFC Process](https://aitbc.io/rfc-process)
|
|
- [ ] I have searched for existing RFCs to avoid duplicates
|
|
- [ ] I have discussed this idea in a GitHub issue first
|
|
- [ ] I have addressed all required sections
|
|
- [ ] I have considered security implications
|
|
- [ ] I have included a testing strategy
|
|
- [ ] I am prepared to respond to feedback
|
|
- [ ] I understand this is a public document
|
|
|
|
## Additional Context
|
|
|
|
_Any additional information, links, or references that help reviewers understand the proposal._
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Review Process
|
|
|
|
1. **Initial Review** (2 weeks minimum)
|
|
- Technical review by core team
|
|
- Community feedback period
|
|
- Security assessment
|
|
|
|
2. **Final Comment Period** (10 days)
|
|
- Last call for objections
|
|
- All issues must be addressed
|
|
- Decision finalization
|
|
|
|
3. **Decision**
|
|
- Accepted: Implementation begins
|
|
- Rejected: Documented with reasoning
|
|
- Deferred: Returned for revisions
|
|
|
|
### Review Guidelines
|
|
|
|
- Provide constructive, technical feedback
|
|
- Consider ecosystem impact
|
|
- Suggest improvements and alternatives
|
|
- Be respectful and professional
|
|
|
|
### Resources
|
|
|
|
- [RFC Process Documentation](https://aitbc.io/rfc-process)
|
|
- [Active RFCs](https://aitbc.io/active-rfcs)
|
|
- [Community Guidelines](https://aitbc.io/community)
|
|
- [Security Guidelines](https://aitbc.io/security)
|